The Bitching thread
- Thread starter AirBo
- Start date
IDK, it would be hard to be homophobic and do that, but it ain't gay AF either. You're fucking a woman who's explicitly getting railed by other dudes. It's turbo-hetero IMO, esp if the dudes crowd-fucking her are staying hard DESPITE rubbing up to each other.
Or maybe who tf cares? I'll let Creed Bratton give you the benefit of the doubt:
I think it's kinda funny that so much of your "average" hardcore porn features double penetration, MMF and gang bangs yet I've never heard anybody call this gay until recently. A sign of the times.
I think it's otherwise interesting to question what we commonly see in mainstream porn.
I make a point to get in their way, forcing them to seriously slow down!
I always believe that in order to be able to participate in those type of activities, you definately need some kind of gay attraction or curiosity. Not judging anyone for this, I couldnt care less.
A lot of rituals that aren't considered as such probably do have a homoerotic aspect to them.
I just think it's interesting that people get turned on by certain scenarios just because they are common in porn.. but it does make sense because media creates fantasies.
I just think it's interesting that people get turned on by certain scenarios just because they are common in porn.. but it does make sense because media creates fantasies.
It doesn't seem pleasant for anybody involved but I'm sure some here will disagree lol
I singled out double anal intercourse, you won 't find that in "mainstream" porno but in:"extreme" porno. Threesomes and gangbangs are in a separate category as there's no male contact, the act I specified is rare as it would cause a non-negligible amount of discomfort to both the female (physical) and male (psychological) participants. Unless we're dealing with a "hotdog down the hallway" situation which makes such a scene less painful and it stands to reason that's usually the case so as to avoid risks of injury on-set.
LOL can't locate the exact video right now but my mind jumped to a Charles Manson interview about how during the 60's, when they'd have a lot of those orgies, Charles wouldn't fixate on if he'd zero in on a woman or a man and just "went with the flow". Makes you wonder if him and Creed ran in the same circles at some crossroads.
Are women automatic lesbians if they have a threesome with a man and their boobs or pussy happen to touch each other?
Being indifferent to something isn't the same as being aroused by it, for one... And I don't think there's anything gay about 2 men fucking a woman
I think the "psychological damage" you're referring to is just you projecting your own feelings regarding your own masculinity. It might be weak enough to feel threatened by the fact there's another penis in proximity. But some very heterosexual, very comfortable in their masculinity men don't give a fuck about this and their focus is entirely on the woman they're fucking.
One could argue that even thinking about the other man's dick while you're fucking a woman is a little bit gay too lol where do we draw the line?
Being indifferent to something isn't the same as being aroused by it, for one... And I don't think there's anything gay about 2 men fucking a woman
I think the "psychological damage" you're referring to is just you projecting your own feelings regarding your own masculinity. It might be weak enough to feel threatened by the fact there's another penis in proximity. But some very heterosexual, very comfortable in their masculinity men don't give a fuck about this and their focus is entirely on the woman they're fucking.
One could argue that even thinking about the other man's dick while you're fucking a woman is a little bit gay too lol where do we draw the line?
I said discomfort, not damage. Nuance worth noting, whether we're talking psychologic or physical.Are women automatic lesbians if they have a threesome with a man and their boobs or pussy happen to touch each other?
Being indifferent to something isn't the same as being aroused by it, for one... And I don't think there's anything gay about 2 men fucking a woman
I think the "psychological damage" you're referring to is just you projecting your own feelings regarding your own masculinity. It might be weak enough to feel threatened by the fact there's another penis in proximity. But some very heterosexual, very comfortable in their masculinity men don't give a fuck about this and their focus is entirely on the woman they're fucking.
One could argue that even thinking about the other man's dick while you're fucking a woman is a little bit gay too lol where do we draw the line?
Again it's not the proximity. It's the friction.
"Are women automatic lesbians if they have a threesome with a man and their boobs or pussy happen to touch each other?"
Potentially. The sexual organs rubbing against each other is the litmus, test, I'd say. As a man, I wouldn't mind, depends on them how comfortable they'd be with each other to allow contact of that sort.
Last edited:
