I just found that part cringeworthy. I had an ATF twenty to twenty-five years ago who told me about the trauma she had from having an abortion after an encounter with a really, really good-looking guy. This provider was stunningly beautiful, and she thought the baby would have grown up to be one of the world’s best looking people.
Guess what? Some dumb shit put that story in a review. This was the earliest days of review boards in the U.S., and hopefully she never saw it before the mods took it out.
There are some things you just don’t say, especially when it is attached to a handle. Abortions and erectile dysfunction are at the top of the list. Why did the documentary folks need to give the guy’s handle? He paid money mostly to have oral sex with her. He would have done her a disservice by writing a review saying he did not get an erection. Most guys just skimming a review might cross her off the list. So the end result is that this guy is less likely to participate in message boards, which is not something any of us want.
And since it might have been clear from the session that she provides multiple positions and aimed to please, he was providing useful information. Take anal sex, for example. I don’t think I am the only one this happened to, by the way. Sometimes a guy will be with a provider who accepts anal play on her and anal sex. It isn’t always the easiest thing in the world to get a covered penis into an anus, particularly in doggie style, if that is the position the guy wants. And most of us are aware that a person needs to switch condoms when going from anal to vaginal.
So let’s say that a guy does anal play with her, she says that anal sex is fine, but he decides that he likely isn’t quite hard enough to have a successful anal sex experience, so they do covered vaginal sex. Most girls who like anal play and anal sex have a better orgasm either during the vaginal sex or via oral sex with some more anal play afterward. He got relatively more excited by getting to do anal play as foreplay. Everyone was happy.
So does the guy have to write that level of detail? If he just says they did anal sex, he is not telling the literal truth, but is anyone harmed in that situation? She gets more customers who are interested in anal sex. If he says she offers anal sex but he didn’t fully engage in the experience, one wonders why. She doesn’t want future customers thinking she wasn’t “clean” or something.
When they made the documentary, they clearly did shortcuts and illustrations. Is there really any difference between that and what the reviewer did? It would be a bigger deal if she didn’t offer multiple positions. Same with multiple cums. A lot of guys, especially younger ones, find it very important to cum twice in an hour. A lot of older guys have longer refractory periods. If the provider is clearly willing to do twice, does the older guy have to say that? He does everyone the same benefit if he says they did two, particularly if he got the second erection but time ran out before he came. But does he have to say that?
To me and to others, the documentary came out anti-customer. I am not sure if she was like that as a provider. I suspect it was as a result of the editing by producers