A lot of good points translated in English here
To try and encourage some of our unilingual friends to participate, I will try to summarize a bit of what has been said in French so far:
mazingerz said:
Moi j'ai plus ...ordinaires
He says agencies are easier to reach, faster to book, but the few indies he has seen were fast and reliable in responding. Also, less "tired" because they generally work shorter shifts. He also says that he didn't really see a difference in service.
Passionate said:
J'ai été déçu...Il faut de tout pour tous...
He was disappointed with agency service, except from Jessy @ MSC. Many delivery delays, girls not meeting his expectations, 5th client of the night... He says he always gets the straight facts with indies because of direct communication. And find them more interesting because they run their own show, therefore are more assertive and intelligent. He also likes the fact that all (translator note: I would change that to
most, there are always expenses) the money goes to them. Also, not all great escorts are cut out to be indy, so agency managers like Jessy are a blessing to these girls.
Maxime said:
Personnellement, je préfère les agences... pas 4000$ par mois à mettre sur les escortes!
He prefers agencies. Says his budget limits him to 2 hours and that indies like longer. He scores lateness equal for indies and agencies. He says that indies put clients under pressure to book longer, and that he has had many one hour indy dates cancelled, he believes because "something better came along". About indies leaving early, and leaving their cellphones on. Agency girls who are negatively reviewed will have a talk with the boss.
Sexy_BBW_Véro said:
c'est vrai qu'avec... plus vraie avec une Indy!
Its' true you have to be more of a gent with an indy. She won't fake it so much, since if she doesn't want to see you again, what is the use? An agency girl has to try, so you will at least call that agency again. What's more, agency girls do not choose their clients. But a proper gentleman is almost assured of a great time with an indy...
Maxime said:
Une fille,... autant en indy qu'en agence!
Chemistry or not, agency or indy, a girl must offer the client satisfaction, so as not to "cheat" him. Why, because of reviews, being professional is primordial, either way.
Sexy_BBW_Véro said:
c'est ton avis ... dechet humain si elle le fait
(Referring to Maxime) I beg to disagree: you seem to think girls are doing this because of lack of other choices. Better stick to agencies with that train of thought. If you think about it, a woman going to bed with a man she has no desire whatsoever, for whatever reason, will close her eyes and wait until it's done. Doesn't that sound like a form of rape? No indy will accept this, she would feel like human refuse afterwards.
Miss Jessy xxx MtlSexCity said:
Salut !...ces 2-3 derniers jours ...
If a client doesn't pass my gent test, no booking, just like you (Vero) say it is with indies. As far as "who is faking the most", I have no idea of how you base that assumption. When a girl refuses to repeat with a client, she has reasons, the most elusive one being "chemistry", the most obvious one, she didn't even want to pass the door... "Chemistry fails", I may send another girl, depending. In the other case, I call the client and explain why he shouldn't call again. Choosing the right clientèle over the phone is always an approximate science. Indies could ask for a picture or a coffee chat. In reference to the Anna N. thread, one could see that an agency girl has a better chance of not living this.
Sexy_BBW_Véro said:
heuuu chere Jessy ... à chacun son 2 cents loll.
Jessy, I was misunderstood and misinterpreted. Apart from you, most agencies (esp male run ones) have no such "gentleman test". By personalized service, I mean that having no driver or boss, she can offer free extras and-or stay longer without having to account for her tie and services. They may sound like a gent, but what about when your girls meet them and they are not? I've been there, what do you do then?