There is no legal context lol. Its illegal for us to buy, its legal for them to sell. By law thats it. But if no buyer then there is no seller ...:/. Its not rocket science. Races/colors/weight/age has nothing to do with it.
How Can an Escort Tell your Ethnicity?
- Thread starter overfiend
- Start date
Huh what? Alors oui elles peuvent refuser les clients. C'est simplement que la majorité des femmes qui choisissent ce métié savent qu'elle seront pas booker par Robert Pattinson...
Oui il peux y avoir des clients beau bonomes mais la majorité sera des hommes seules qui cherche un peu d'amour. Alors oui devenir escorte en esperant avoir que des clients "hot" c'est irrealiste.
Les escortes comprennent qui sera leur clientels et regarde surtout que le client soit gentil, propre et la respecte. C'est un boulot. Elles vendent du reve.
En lisant ton poste je note autant une condescendance malsaine sur les clients que les femmes qui ce devouent a ce metier et rendent notre vie plus agreable.
C'est clair que ce métier est pas fait pour toi mademoiselle. Mais tu peux etre sugar baby ou masseusse...
No, we cannot completely remove the legal aspect for the SP, as it is applicable under Canadian law.
To make it short:
The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (2014) does not explicitly state that a sex worker can refuse any client for any personal reason.
This right arises implicitly from a fundamental principle of Canadian law: the requirement of free and informed consent in any situation involving the body or sexuality.
Legal basis for the right to refuse a client
Criminal Code, section 273.1 → defines sexual consent as “the voluntary agreement to engage in the sexual activity in question.”
Therefore, there is no obligation to accept a client, for any reason whatsoever.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 7 → protects the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, including control over one’s own body.
Civil and commercial law → There is no enforceable sexual contract; a client cannot demand the service, and the refusal is always valid.
In summary: The right to refuse any client is based on the principle of free consent, not on an explicit clause in the 2014 Act.
It is likely for this reason that the founders of MERB wisely consulted legal opinions when drafting Forum Rule 21.
For the client, the thread’s question is:
“How Can an Escort Tell Your Ethnicity?”
Tes paroles me font pleurer lorsque tu prétends que ce métier n’est pas fait pour moi. Depuis mon enfance, j’ai toujours nourri le rêve de devenir escort et d’apporter du bonheur aux hommes. Jamais je ne me laisserai décourager par des personnes comme toi. Un jour, je réaliserai pleinement mon rêve, et j’espère même remporter le trophée de la meilleure escort de l’année 2025. À moi ces dicks et tous ces hommes !
MOD
I’m not sure what Halloween Mike has against this new provider, but he’s criticizing her way of screening and selecting clients.
11. Discussion on provider rates, and screening methods are allowed for information purposes only. Rate shaming or shaming a provider for her screening methods is not allowed and the posts will be removed.
Yet our rules are clear: Forum Rules – https://merb.cc/xenforo/pages/forum-rules/
And upon reading our rules, we could probably find other applicable sections as well.
Is this animosity toward the provider? Because in that post, he states:
I’m not sure what Halloween Mike has against this new provider, but he’s criticizing her way of screening and selecting clients.
11. Discussion on provider rates, and screening methods are allowed for information purposes only. Rate shaming or shaming a provider for her screening methods is not allowed and the posts will be removed.
Yet our rules are clear: Forum Rules – https://merb.cc/xenforo/pages/forum-rules/
And upon reading our rules, we could probably find other applicable sections as well.
Is this animosity toward the provider? Because in that post, he states:
Le point était de dire que dans des cas le refus n'est pas une option d'un point de vue financier et pas nécessairement parce que le client ne convient pas.
Certaines peuvent se permettre d'être plus sélectives d'autres non.
I don't understand the legal context either. Hypothetical situation #1: an escort shows up at a client's hotel room. Upon the client opening the door, the escort observes that he is an Indian client, a group she doesn't service. She informs the client, bluntly, "sorry, but I do not service Indian clients." She then walks out, leaving the client holding his boner.
Can he sue for illegal discrimination? Of course not, because he was engaged in an illegal activity. There is no discrimination. Under the law, the transaction is "void ab initio"- void from inception due to illegality. Therefore, no illegal discrimination could occur. At most it was non--actionable prejudice against an ethnicity.
Hypothetical situation #2: an escort shows up at client's hotel room. She has advertised to the client her rate is $300 per hour. The client hands the escort $300. She says to the client, "thank you. I just need to go downstairs and pay the driver." She doesn't come back.
Let's assume the client knows the escort's full name and address. Can he bring a small claims lawsuit against her, for breach of contract?
Answer: No. This lawsuit would be dismissed by any Judge in any court of competent jurisdiction in the USA or Canada. Anyone who has studied law and taken a course in contracts knows that the consideration for a contract cannot be meretricious or for services not allowed under the law. There is no contract and the $300 may not be returned, nor the contract enforced, on a breach of contract theory.
Can the client pursue a misdemeanor theft charge with the police?
On these same facts in the USA, under no circumstances as you would be admitting to a misdemeanor in order to pursue a misdemeanor charge which, in all likelihood, would not be charged. More likely is that the client would be charged if he foolishly pursued this with the police.
On these same facts in Montreal, I suspect the same analysis would apply.
So bringing up laws and legal rights is all bullshit because none of it is enforceable in Court. If it's not enforceable in Court it's not only bullshit, but bullshit in its purest and most unadulterated form. It's Super Bullshit.
By the way, I have an actual law degree and I have passed the bar in 3 US jurisdictions. You would be surprised that questions like the ones I posted above make their way onto law school exams (contracts and criminal law) and in some form on bar exams as well. Law school professors try to trick you into allowing yourself to think like a civilian instead of a lawyer. That's what separates the lawyers from the civilians in the tested group.
Last edited:
