Uncut gems
- Thread starter Flyingby
- Start date
I can normally tell who’s European by their dick’s hair cut? Circumcision circumstances? Extra skin? Turtleneck situation?
Anyways…same for Americans although it’s not 100% accurate
Anyways…same for Americans although it’s not 100% accurate
Circumcision isn’t really common in countries like France, Italy, Spain for instance but very common in USA
Jewish so you know I am. Muslims too. I feel we are less guys that are cut then uncut. Survey will give us the answer. Good question
Not really. It just tell you among the people who have answered their answer.
But as you mentioned religion play an importance in that. Also in North America somehow is culturally a norm (my guess is that I noticed since living here that NA doctors tend to be safe than sorry) whereas in the rest of the world it's usually done if any issue occurs rather than preventive.
Point is we will need to know also the religion and/or country of birth to have a better grasp at the data.
Well it used to be readily offered when you gave birth to a boy, at the hospital before you even left. Now if you give birth, you need to search for a urologist if you want your son cut, and pay for it yourself.
Early 1970s:
Circumcision was a common practice in Canada, with rates reaching 47.4% of male infants in 1973.
1975:
The CPS issued a statement against routine circumcision, citing a lack of medical necessity.
Mid-1980s:
Provincial health ministries began removing coverage for routine circumcision, leading to a decline in the procedure.
1996:
The CPS reaffirmed its position, stating the benefits and harms of circumcision were evenly balanced.
2005:
Manitoba became the last province to discontinue insurance coverage for routine circumcision.
2015:
The CPS updated its position statement, acknowledging potential benefits in certain high-risk populations but still not recommending routine circumcision.
Early 1970s:
Circumcision was a common practice in Canada, with rates reaching 47.4% of male infants in 1973.
1975:
The CPS issued a statement against routine circumcision, citing a lack of medical necessity.
Mid-1980s:
Provincial health ministries began removing coverage for routine circumcision, leading to a decline in the procedure.
1996:
The CPS reaffirmed its position, stating the benefits and harms of circumcision were evenly balanced.
2005:
Manitoba became the last province to discontinue insurance coverage for routine circumcision.
2015:
The CPS updated its position statement, acknowledging potential benefits in certain high-risk populations but still not recommending routine circumcision.
I just read it is 32% cut in Canada. And only 3% at birth in Québec stats from 2018
As an SP, I have no preference.
It really doesn't make much difference in the end. I have dated guys who were either way.
It really doesn't make much difference in the end. I have dated guys who were either way.
I kept reading and saw the same in a 2015 paper saying "However, the rate of neonatal circumcision has declined over time to the current Canadian average of 32%, with significant regional variability."
I'm guessing Nationaly it was 47.4% in 1975 when it was being covered by healthcare instead of families choosing to pay out of pocket, reducing the number down to 32% by 2015.
I see the percentage is much lower in Quebec, but it seemed pretty even from what I have personally handled threwout life.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
- Poll
- Locked
- Sticky
- Poll
- Locked
- Sticky
- Poll