They get fucked a lot more if they elect lying, hypocritical Republicans. Not just the disgraced former president who did SO much damage to his country and incited the treasonous insurrection, but also his corrupt ass-kissing enablers such as Cruz, Graham, Hawley, Greene, Jordan, Gohmert, Gaetz and SO many others. The only Republicans with a shred of decency are Romney, Cheney, Sasse and maybe a few others.
Trump 2nd Impeachment trial
- Thread starter Womaniser
- Start date
TNB,
I don’t know why you would quote me with this kind of explanation.
I hate to disappoint you but Trump was never important to me and my way of life has not changed when he was elected or before him and it will not change now.
My life at this stage revolves completely around family and thankfully not even a change in government in the country I live in will make any difference to me let alone in a foreign country.
Yes whatever happens in the US effects Canada but me personally, not a chance.
As my caption says you make your own luck in life.
I don’t know why you would quote me with this kind of explanation.
I hate to disappoint you but Trump was never important to me and my way of life has not changed when he was elected or before him and it will not change now.
My life at this stage revolves completely around family and thankfully not even a change in government in the country I live in will make any difference to me let alone in a foreign country.
Yes whatever happens in the US effects Canada but me personally, not a chance.
As my caption says you make your own luck in life.
Who will they call for witnesses? This may get interesting
If he is convicted Saully (note, not using word impeached, lol) but if he gets convicted IN THIS IMPEACHMENT TRIAL It’s not automatic he is barred from running for future office, senate has to vote on the additional issue on disqualification for future office. @ least that’s my interpretation, which is fucking correct
If they can vote on that(disqualification to hold future office) surely they can vote on his post presidential perks. It’s quite possible. Not that it will matter to Trumpy though as he will prob make $$ speaking and a book
If they can vote on that(disqualification to hold future office) surely they can vote on his post presidential perks. It’s quite possible. Not that it will matter to Trumpy though as he will prob make $$ speaking and a book
^^^^^^^ Found this.
Both posts get some repercussions of an impeachment correct. However, Costiloe fails to mention that revocation of these benefits is contingent upon the Senate convicting Trump before his term is up, and Sharp lists several benefits that are not affected by impeachment.
Both posts get some repercussions of an impeachment correct. However, Costiloe fails to mention that revocation of these benefits is contingent upon the Senate convicting Trump before his term is up, and Sharp lists several benefits that are not affected by impeachment.
Maybe because you consistently defend Trump and consistently criticize Biden?
The Republicans impeached Clinton for lying about a blow job. You know, maybe it's even possible that some MERB member once did the same thing - who knows?
The Democrats on the other hand impeached Trump (the SECOND time) for trying to overthrow American democracy by stealing an election and inviting his cultists to Washington on January 6th, resulting in a violent treasonous attack on democracy in which a police officer was murdered by Trump-loving right-wing wack jobs.
But, oh yeah, I guess lying about a blow job was really, really bad. As a well-known poster says, "ha ha".
The only thing I have defended Trump about was his economic policies, which I still say were better than anything the Democrats have to offer, and yes I believe this whole impeachment is a farce and a waste of tax payer money.
I am just not naive enough to believe that the Democrats in your words are “intelligent and decent people” and the Republicans are evil and all have egos like Trump.
They are all scumbags and want the power and the money that goes along with it.
You are right that I will not defend Biden, I think he is just as corrupt and an aging senile fucktard who is not capable to fulfill the job of President.
An honest Republican :
Congressman Adam Kinzinger: Country First | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO) - YouTube
Congressman Adam Kinzinger: Country First | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO) - YouTube
This seems to be a recurring theme with you. My two cents: Science is absolute and always true, but scientists are not. Don't mistake the two as being the same thing.
As one, you know this, that scientists don't prove anything, you gather evidence and make observations that support your predictions. If you manage to replicate your observations many times over, you speak about theories and facts, but at no point have you proved anything.
As for an example in the article, most people believe the data around climate change, however, they question what it means, what should be done about it, and how it should be done. Not often, but there are times I question the advice of my doctors, lawyers, accountants, financial advisors, architects, etc. I even at times question the great Dr. Fauci. I also shake my head when one month I'm told to limit caffeine intake to a cup of coffee, then told later to drink as much as I want. Egg yokes are bad for you, but now, not so much.
Science should never be questioned, but scientists and their observations, conclusions and recommendations always should. Don't forget about your esteemed colleagues who told us to put asbestosis in our walls, administer thalidomide to our pregnant wives and fill our cavities with mercury. And who could forget the great Aristotle that told us the heart was the source of our intelligence and the brain was responsible for keeping it cool.
To tie this back to the thread, no one disputes the words used by trump in his speech nor the chaos that followed with those lunatics that raided the capitol. People question how to tie those two events to each other, what it means and what should be done.
Yes, I forgot about the great scientist Trump. Its always welcomed to have you insert yourself into an adult conversation with such meaningful insight.
Acquitted
www.cnn.com
February 13, 2021 Trump impeachment trial news
The Senate voted Saturday to acquit former President Trump of inciting insurrection at the Capitol. Follow here for the latest.
I wonder how GOB senators will schedule their task of going licking Trump's a..s everyday as long as he will live?Acquitted
February 13, 2021 Trump impeachment trial news
The Senate voted Saturday to acquit former President Trump of inciting insurrection at the Capitol. Follow here for the latest.
How much of a mismatch is there between Schumer and McConnell, wow, god damn
Probably the same way the Dumbocrat senators will lick Kamala's a..s everyday for the next 4 years.
Figuratively and literally, my choice would be to lick Kamala over Trump, the opposite of yours.
Debatable
But I suppose any reasonable person with common sense could see through the political tension and would know that that was not really her intent.
Similar threads
