You forgot that in the US using escort service is considered a turpitude and a borderline crime. This is why these people are stepping down. You again are trying to make people guilty by association with the logic that no way all these people did not use service of underaged girls if Epstein did. I don’t buy it. Maybe very selective few but not in general. These few need to be persecuted and the rest left alone by the hypocritical media and public.
(A) If I readily conceded--twice--that appearance in the files is not in and of itself evidence of wrongdoing, there's no logical connection of any sort to me making people guilty by association.
Again, there is no hard evidence that somebody met underaged girls besides Epstein, only speculation. I would like to see the evidence that can stay in court.
www.theglobeandmail.com
Somehow, I missed that story.
Robert Trivers is an evolutionary biologist at Harvard. Epstein had a lot of contact with some Harvard faculty who tried/hope to get money from him for their research. This email is explaining some very basic facts about trans-sexuals to Epstein. Like everything in the Epstein files, it has no context. There is no way to know what led to this email exchange, but it's just a meaningless, casual email exchange containing info that anyone could easily find using ChatGPT or by doing a Google search. The "trans movement" has nothing to do with Epstein or Trivers.
It's just another crazy part of the democrats' diversity platform that was rejected by the American people in the 2024 election.
Thank you, MMX, for an excellent, concise summary of the truth about the Epstein saga. Though I disagree that Epstein was a "proven pedophile" (he never had any encounters with or expressed an interest in pre-pubescent girls) but he did have sexual encounters with a number of underage (under 18) girls and that is indeed a crime. He plead guilty, served time and was obliged to register as a sex offender. What most people overlook about those encounters is that he paid the girls which makes them prostitutes. In fact, he was specifically convicted of two crimes-one was sex with an adult (18+) prostitute and the other was sex with a minor prostitute (a girl who was almost 18 at the time). Also, it was the girls themselves, led primarily by Virginia Giuffre) who recruited their friends and acquaintances to provide services to Epstein in exchange for cash. They knew exactly what they were doing. That doesn't make it morally right or legal, but it shows that the girls were willing "partners in crime."
). 
www.nbcnews.com
The allegation against Prince Andrew concerns his sharing of inside information about British trade policy with Epstein. The allegation has little or nothing to do with any sexual improprieties that have been rumored about Andrew. Virginia Giuffre made up a bunch of lies about having sex with him but she retracted her lies when she was required to swear to them under the threat of perjury. She had her photo take with him when she was 18+. So what--that proves nothing, other than the fact that she was one of Epstein's prostitutes who sometimes traveled with him.
This sounds like insider trading except instead of being able to sell stock at an inflated price due to the inside information, he instead thought he was getting leads or intel from Epstein regarding either young pussy or, perhaps, legal pussy. So it's really a different kind of insider trading. But I suppose the bottom line for British LE is that trade policy isn't up for trade to private individuals, whether the gain is financial or just sexual leads.
Although in one sense this may be amusing, it's a real concern that we could have politicians making pillow talk with spies and others, even getting blow jobs in exchange for State secrets.
