The Most Reliable and Satisfying Escort Agencies Poll.

[DouMan]

I chalked 1 for MSC + 1 for SD.

I would also add 1 for Asservissante but they are not on the poll.

Never had any problems all the times that I dealt with these 3 agencies. They always have cheerful and courteous reception on the phone and always on time. If a delay would happen (never more than 15 minutes so far) they would give me a call.

I even met Peter from SD a few times when he would chauffeur to my hotel and he is just as pleasant in real life as on the phone.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am not knocking on the other well renown agencies, it’s simply that scheduling didn’t match my to-do list when I called.

 

[korbel]

Eleganza is having the same problem that almost all Montreal agencies are having: which is that it is very hard to hire new talent right now.

But he plays the game better than most.

His site is filled with gorgeous young girls.

(which Merbite vets like Korbel, Techman and Special K claim (in public) not be be interested in...I mean there's no difference between a 20 year old and a 30 year old....right guys)

But then when you call, he claims to be fully booked and he offers you a veteran SP that everyone in the city has seen a 100 times.

This is an old in-calls trick and you guys fall for it all the time.

******

Of course I shouldn't talk. I fell into that trap myself just today, with another prominent Merb advertiser. They advertised one of their stars, I booked, called to confirm...but she never showed.

The girl they sent as a substitute wasn't bad, (in fact she is one of the highest rated girls on MERB) ...but I had seen her from her younger days with two other agencies over the years under two different names...in fact dating all the way back to her when she got her start in the in-calls....

(Oh and there was of course that minor detail that she was a full eight years older than advertised...but of course on Merb no one cares about that).

Hello Benson,

I don't know what is going on at Eleganza. But no one there has ever tried to push someone on me that I did not want. What is extremely perplexing is that the agency has many names listed though almost no one seems to be working on any given day. In fact some ladies listed have not been marked as available for weeks at a time. For six trips in a row now I have been lucky if two or three names were mentioned to chose from when I have called, always between Thursday and Sunday. I am starting to believe several ladies have gone and the listed has just never been updated. By comparison, at Devilish last night I was offered between 7-8 choices.

TongueNCheek, in the last 10 days I have emailed Eleganza through their own system, sent a PM with the same..."the box is full" result as you, and called at least 4 times since the 11th of July. The basic results were...coldness...rudeness...no response. Two years ago this was one of the best agencies in Montreal and I saw their ladies several times. I don't know what Eleganza is now. In my view a great agency offers access and choice. For me, they don't.

The lady I saw on Friday I had met nearly 4 years ago at Dangerous Curves and had seen 5 time before this Friday night. We had a very good rapport right from the start. She asked me not to mention her name anywhere or write any kind of review. Even if she and I did not have a fabulous connection I could not and should not deny her request. However, I did see Nikki of Devilish last night and...KABAAM...what a delicious hottie...literally! Review to follow sometime this week.

Cheerio,

Korbel

 

[stripley]

Why Eleganza?

I'm curious. Why did those who voted for Eleganza do so?

There have been a few theories bandied about that don't seem credible. Eleganza really has very few older SP's so there really isn't any one to push you towards if your first choice is booked. It is the SP's choice when and how long they work. If randomly answering the phone manages to book the available SP's time, then I guess there is little incentive to book via e-mails, PM's or voicemails.

I'm curious how Devilish always seems to have so many SP's available on every given night. Perhaps a little more on the quantity than quality though there seems to be some gems at Devilish as well.

 

[Special K]

His site is filled with gorgeous young girls.

(which Merbite vets like Korbel, Techman and Special K claim (in public) not be be interested in...I mean there's no difference between a 20 year old and a 30 year old....right guys)

Now WTF are you talking about Benny? Did I ever say there was no difference between a 20 and 30 year old? Please, point it out to me smartass. What there is no difference between is the f'n horseshit you were peddling when a girls 21 and not Oh GOD FORBID 20!! Smarten up Benny! As we discussed via PM, keep your shit to yourself!

 

[UHGL]

Just last December, I was in Montreal for the Winter GT at The De La Montagne, and Eleganza was the BEST agency...... fast forward to my last trip in June.... wow! a change for the worst. I have to agree with most of what has been said before about Eleganza. It is too bad, because I still think that John has the hottest lineup of any agency and IMHO the most GFE service in general.

I see now, what good is a agency with a massive beautiful lineup, when no one works or no one is there to answer the phone. I hope John turns it around and puts more effort in running the agency and finds more SP's that want to work........ and maybe finds someone that will run his agency like a real business.

 

[Techman]

Eleganza is having the same problem that almost all Montreal agencies are having: which is that it is very hard to hire new talent right now.

But he plays the game better than most.

His site is filled with gorgeous young girls.

(which Merbite vets like Korbel, Techman and Special K claim (in public) not be be interested in...I mean there's no difference between a 20 year old and a 30 year old....right guys)

But then when you call, he claims to be fully booked and he offers you a veteran SP that everyone in the city has seen a 100 times.

This is an old in-calls trick and you guys fall for it all the time.

******

Of course I shouldn't talk. I fell into that trap myself just today, with another prominent Merb advertiser. They advertised one of their stars, I booked, called to confirm...but she never showed.

The girl they sent as a substitute wasn't bad, (in fact she is one of the highest rated girls on MERB) ...but I had seen her from her younger days with two other agencies over the years under two different names...in fact dating all the way back to her when she got her start in the in-calls....

(Oh and there was of course that minor detail that she was a full eight years older than advertised...but of course on Merb no one cares about that).

Hey, benson!!! When the hell did any of us claim we didn't like younger ladies? What we had a problem with was your continuous complaining about a possible 1 or 2 year age difference between the advertised and actual age of a SP. Nowhere did anyone state they disliked younger women.

You also continue to claim that it is hard for agencies to hire new talent. How do you know this exactly? Are you running ads for agencies? Do you have regular contact with all the agency owners in Montreal to discuss this? Or is it just another of your pet peeves with no evidence to back it up?

And again you have the nerve to insult every board member by insinuating that they aren't bright enough not to fall for a B&S. What the hell gives you, who have been here all of 3 months, the right to proclaim yourself the master of all things to do with the Mtl sex scene?

And finally you mention an encounter 'with another prominent Merb advertiser' but you don't have the balls to give either the name of the agency or the ladies involved.

Everyone is really tired of your constant complaining and your know it all attitude. When things start going against you, you run back and delete all your posts like a child trying to erase the evidence. Why don't you just erase your handle completely and save us all a lot of grief.

 

[korbel]

Everyone is really tired of your constant complaining and your know it all attitude. When things start going against you, you run back and delete all your posts like a child trying to erase the evidence. Why don't you just erase your handle completely and save us all a lot of grief.

Okay Techman,

Benson has the right to say what he wants as long as he doesn't break the rules. Though many of us would agree with you, I don't think we need a repeat of the battle between the two of you that has already been done to death. If Benson isn't attacking anyone or writing lies then he has the same rights no matter who hates what he says. You are certainly more than capable of confronting him and questioning what he says without saying he should get out of Merb. What about the ignore button?

OUT OF LINE,

Korbel

PS,

Benson...Techman is right about a few things. You have not proven there is a real age problem. And, if you see someone who has not requested anonimity you should provide a name. IF you are worried about how others will react then don't make a post that doesn't help anyone. If you insist on posting then have the guts to do it properly...please.

 

[Techman]

If Benson isn't attacking anyone or writing lies then he has the same rights no matter who hates what he says.

Has he provided any proof to back up his claims? Even when he posts that he has had a bad experience he refuses to back it up with names. Breaking the rules? How about this one...

v) Posting false or otherwise unverified information with the intent to either damage the reputation or otherwise of a service provider or agency or, to gain favor of a service provider or agency.

By refusing to name the agency he supposedly had a bad experience with, he brings all of merb's advertising agencies into doubt. I figure that qualifies as damaging the reputation of an agency, all agencies in fact.

Originally Posted by bensonnobalia
But then when you call, he claims to be fully booked and he offers you a veteran SP that everyone in the city has seen a 100 times.

This is an old in-calls trick and you guys fall for it all the time.

This is not the first time he has insinuated that merbites are not the brightest. Of course the other instances have since been deleted.

Originally Posted by bensonnobalia
I never posted possible age differences, only provable ones through tracking dates of MERB reviews, or through my previous encounters with them. IMHO a provable one or two year difference is crucial, because it always indicates that the difference is much more than that.

You haven't posted even one provable age difference. The only provable one is one where you have seen proof of the lady's age. Board posts prove nothing as there is always the possibility that the girl was under 18 when first reviewed. And none of your previous encounters have ever been posted and cannot be verified.

As far as him getting out of merb...well all this guy has done since he arrived here is stir things up. He is always complaining about something. Either the girls ages are incorrect, the agencies don't have enough new talent, the agencies are B&S, and on and on. What is he doing here if all he is doing is complaining and posting accusations without proof? Do you think that this is good for the board? I can't see it being very good for the board to have this guy always calling it's advertisers into question and it's members gullible fools.

And you have the nerve to call me out of line????? Everything this guy has done has been out of line! This guy is not here to share information, he is only here to cause problems. And in my opinion I don't feel the board needs members like him. Why should I ignore him? Should I have ignored others that came here to cause problems only to vanish or be banned once their agenda came out into the open? Sounds like another place I used to visit.

Techman

 

[eastender]

Off Topic

This thread has drifted off topic in an extreme fashion. Mainly because people with agendas, age issue and Eleganza have used it as a platform to promote certain viewpoints.

Shortly I will start a new thread that will focus on one of the elements responsible for the drift.

 

[Special K]

And you have the nerve to call me out of line????? Everything this guy has done has been out of line! This guy is not here to share information, he is only here to cause problems. And in my opinion I don't feel the board needs members like him. Why should I ignore him? Should I have ignored others that came here to cause problems only to vanish or be banned once their agenda came out into the open? Sounds like another place I used to visit.

Techman

Korbie,

In my opinion, and like assholes everyone has one, it's you who was out of line in calling out Techman. He's spot on in every point he's made regarding Benny.

SK

 

[korbel]

Korbie,

In my opinion, and like assholes everyone has one, it's you who was out of line in calling out Techman. He's spot on in every point he's made regarding Benny.

SK

Hello Special K,

Well, no one has to listen to me. But in my view the exchange between Benson and Techman is a rehashed battle of the same war where both have said pretty much all they could say about each other. Frankly, I am tired of repeat battles that carry over to any thread. And, make no mistake. Anybody telling or implying someone else to get off the boards IS out of line, no matter if every other point he made is accurate. If Benson is a "shit stirrer" he's one of many.

As for agendas, it's been obvious for years some have had personal ones with individual members amounting to vendettas. When one member has had very current experiences with an agency it is most pointedly relevant to a thread on the effectiveness of agencies. Having just come back from a trip and having dealt with Eleganza, an update on their service belongs right here without a doubt. But perhaps people who don't hobby just can't see it. If you have FACTUAL EXPERIENCE that contrasts with mine then please post it. Otherwise you aren't credible on that point.

Cheers,

Korbel

 

[Special K]

Having just come back from a trip and having dealt with Eleganza, an update on their service belongs right here without a doubt. But perhaps people who don't hobby just can't see it. If you have FACTUAL EXPERIENCE that contrasts with mine then please post it. Otherwise you aren't credible on that point.

Cheers,

Korbel

What contrast are you speaking of? I haven't a clue about what "FACTUAL EXPERIENCE" you are talking about?

SK

 

[korbel]

What contrast are you speaking of? I haven't a clue about what "FACTUAL EXPERIENCE" you are talking about?

SK

Hello Special K,

I was referring to the statement made by my great friend Eastender who thinks I have an "agenda" just because I have written some facts about my recent experiences with Eleganza that don't favor the agency.

Cheers,

Korbel

 

[korbel]

I always knew you two were best friends, the mutual admiration and goodwill just spills over. You can feel the love

Hello Daringly,

Yes, and I got a marvelous collection of steak knives by just reaching behind my back...bwahahahahaha.

Toodles,

Korbel

PS

CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR 150TH VOTER.

 

[eastender]

Agendas

Hello Special K,

I was referring to the statement made by my great friend Eastender who thinks I have an "agenda" just because I have written some facts about my recent experiences with Eleganza that don't favor the agency.

Cheers,

Korbel

Korbel,

Refer to your posts #'s 58 and 69 in this thread which you started as a public poll, titled "The Most Reliable and Satisfying Escort Agencies Poll".

From post # 58 it is rather obvious that this is an on going "six trips" issue for you and if someone cannot put rejection behind them after being rejected six times then the possibility of an AGENDA should be considered.

Finally this is a public poll about ALL the listed agencies. There is a distinct
Eleganza thread where your complaint may find an audience BUT harping on your continued rejection takes away from the integrity of the poll. While it may be acceptable for a poster to comment favourably about his choice(s) once in a poll there no need to bash someone who they did not vote for once or ad infinitum.

 

[korbel]

Korbel,

Refer to your posts #'s 58 and 69 in this thread which you started as a public poll, titled "The Most Reliable and Satisfying Escort Agencies Poll".

From post # 58 it is rather obvious that this is an on going "six trips" issue for you and if someone cannot put rejection behind them after being rejected six times then the possibility of an AGENDA should be considered.

Finally this is a public poll about ALL the listed agencies. There is a distinct
Eleganza thread where your complaint may find an audience BUT harping on your continued rejection takes away from the integrity of the poll. While it may be acceptable for a poster to comment favourably about his choice(s) once in a poll there no need to bash someone who they did not vote for once or ad infinitum.

Hey Eastender,

Perhaps it is you who should be questioned. So it is acceptable to post something favorably...but there is no need to "bash someone". Well son, in a poll about the effectiveness of agencies what could be more relevant than current experiences. If you deny that then you are either a white knight for some agency, incapable of seeing it, intentionally avoiding the easy logic, or you have an "agenda" against Korbie....or some combination of these. Really Eastender, what can you offer about the facts regarding the service of any agency since you do not hobby????? My posts about Eleganza were all perfectly "favorable" when it was warranted. That favor isn't justified now, so you insinuate I should what...ignore...lie...just play kissy kissy with them? What about the other posters confirming the same experiences??? Your recent posts here are just another object example of the White Knightism that happens whenever anybody criticizes the performance of a lady or an ageny that has driven many good and honest posters away from this board.

If you can't stick to the subject instead of criticizing and making obviously wrong insinuations, then I am done with you.

Thanks for the love,

Korbel

 

[eastender]

Polling Integrity

Hey Eastender,

Perhaps it is you who should be questioned. So it is acceptable to post something favorably...but there is no need to "bash someone". Well son, in a poll about the effectiveness of agencies what could be more relevant than current experiences. If you deny that then you are either a white knight for some agency, incapable of seeing it, intentionally avoiding the easy logic, or you have an "agenda" against Korbie....or some combination of these. Really Eastender, what can you offer about the facts regarding the service of any agency since you do not hobby????? My posts about Eleganza were all perfectly "favorable" when it was warranted. That favor isn't justified now, so you insinuate I should what...ignore...lie...just play kissy kissy with them? What about the other posters confirming the same experiences???

If you can't stick to the subject instead of criticizing and making obviously wrong insinuations, then I am done with you.

Thanks for the love,

Korbel

Issue is about polling. If you want to change a specific agency's business model then a public poll featuring many agencies is not the venue since it does a disservice to all the other listed agencies. After all the other agencies do not contribute in any fashion to a specific agencies business model. So you go to the appropriate thread or start one and compile the experiences of others willing to participate. Build a data bank or consensus and move forward anticipating change.

Since I have degrees in mathematics and work with statistics often, I see my share of polls. My comments are limited to the validity of a poll as a venue for the issue raised. If a poll about hamburgers or pizza would take a similar turn then the same comments would be made regardless of the originator or poster.

 

[eastender]

Ironic

LOL E,

The issue of the thread is "The Most Reliable and Satisfying Escort Agencies Poll." I ought to know I created the thread and wrote the title. This thread is about AGENCY EFFICIENCY. That makes any truthful experience relevant. So give us all a break and stop trying to commandeer this thread to fit your very narrow purpose and display an alleged expertise no gives a darn about. You still have not provided one fact about the efficiency of any agency...so why are you here on this thread??? If you want to have a professional data thread tailored to show your AMAZING SKILLS, then go start one and try hold everyone to your tedious standards.

Kisses,

Korbel

Korbie,

Based on your poll Eleganza is the third most efficient agency out of the ten listed. This is a simple fact based on interpretation of the data available to date.

May just start a series of polls that will focus on the service side of things.

 

[korbel]

The way the things are turning out on this thread maybe the name should just be changed to the Korbel vs eastender bout.

Come on guys kiss + make up and lets move forward

Hello Douman,

The thread is basically for reporting on personal experiences with escort agencies to benefit all. If we all stuck to that there would be no such bout.

I did have two experiences with Devilish last week. One was with a lady who requested anonymity. Mike of Devilish helped me set up the appointment and follow through into what turned out to be a great surprise reunion since I had not seen her after she joined Devilish. The other lady was Nikki of the same agency. In that case Mark suggested the lady out of several who were available at the time. She is a real sexy doll and we had a pretty nice connection. At this point I have had more successful encounters and more altogether with Devilish than any other agency.

Cheers,

Korbel

 

[korbel]

Hello all,

Well, the last couple of days for voting is here. Thanks to all who have voted. I can't remember seeing 155 voters on any poll ever before. Congratulations to Montreal XXXTASE on achieving the most votes by a wide margin. You must be doing a lot right.

Bravo!

Korbel