Social media presence

[Valentina Amante]

I won't derail any further but I'm open to discussion in DMs if we can be civil about it. Otherwise we're gonna see this familiar sight
View attachment 103006

Ah so you admit it’s you who derails and gets threads locked.

As always it’s:
“tais-toi pis fait la belle”

Don’t care for dm convos with people who cannot be civil or lack respect with their backhanded comments in public. Which means I won’t care for fake dialogue in private.

My so-called “actions” were just disagreeing with one of your favorites in a thread. Big deal. People need to get over the fact that not everyone will agree with them - especially on public boards.

Because I didn’t agree? They then publicly berated and dog piled on me on socials. This SP then tweeted that I was “privileged” because I am white provider… simply because I didn’t agree. This is exactly on topic. Because this is exactly what they all fkn do. With their lib buzzwords of “micro aggressions”. Extremely hypocritical might I add. As if calling out someone for the colour of their skin isn’t fkn racist in itself and not a MicrOAggRessIon. People need to realize that they’re bullies and they’re fake af and in a cult filled with narcissists. They’re the actual gaslighters. Lmao.

Anyway.

I wish everyone else a great evening with sloppy bjs.

 

[Fradi]

I will avoid SP that bash men on their social media or that spew political opinions either for the right or left don’t need that kind of shit.
I hate politicians and politics from all sides as far as I am concerned the only time you are sure of getting fucked is when you deal with a politician.

I don’t mind SP talking about real life and the dangers they face or if they have a sense of humour when describing the idiotic things clients come up with but when it is outright bashing and you can feel that they hate their work and their clients then it is time to avoid.

I don’t like the in your face warrior princesses either regardless of their cause. When I see an SP I want a gorgeous young lady who is kind, considerate, interesting to talk to and makes you forget about all the crap in the world not one that brings it up and wants to argue over it.

They want to champion their causes great do it with someone else, I book them for what they are advertising an unforgettable fantasy that will blow your mind.

This is why I see so few SP and ones that I have known for many years and are friends.

 

[Valentina Amante]

makes you forget about all the crap in the world not one that brings it up and wants to argue over it.

Great fkn point here

 

[LC18]

Bon bon bon. Jamais moyen d’avoir une petite question innocente ici. Il faut toujours que ça vire en débat. Vous êtes donc bien plates

 

[terrybogard88]

Some providers have accounts on Twitter or others,
and I find that they generally do a good job at advertising themselves,
sometimes even advertising each other.
In some cases, their publications made me think "wow, she is awesome, I have to meet her"

But in some cases, it was the opposite.
Examples of publications that made me think "nope" :

• Religious and anti-vax mumbo-jumbo
• Responding to Elon's tweets to tell him how awesome he is
• Bitching about climate activists

well the three example you mentionned are clear cases of 'nope' , for sure

 

[EastWind]

I get this perspective and I wish I was built like that but I don't see companions to fuck and forget. I need to be able to have an intelligent conversation with them otherwise I'd just invest in a Real Doll and stay home.

You gotta do you. There is no way around it. Your money your time your fantasy your happiness.

 

[Ducon]

How is it left-leaning? The last time I checked feminists are against sex work.

You'd think feminists would support other women's right to do whatever they want with their body and to make money.
Well, in fact, many do, but they might not get as much mainstream media attention. Also the top experts on the subject are sex workers themselves who usually don't want to be in the spotlight.

 

[Ducon]

she said how she hates Capitalism, etc.. But it is so ironic she says that because selling sexual services is 100% Capitalistic.

Taking money from rich men is actually the logical thing to do in this situation.
When forced to play a game, might as well play it well.

 

[luxurystacy]

How is it left-leaning? The last time I checked feminists are against sex work. I seen some tweets from a SW on twitter, she is a far-left feminist, she said how she hates Capitalism, etc.. But it is so ironic she says that because selling sexual services is 100% Capitalistic. She is a misandrist yet she is serving male clients. There is so much irony and hypocrisy in that. SW is neither left-leaning or right-leaning because both sides are against it.

I think its important to mention that the word and meaning of feminism as been misunderstood, misinterpreted over the years. It also been used for radical purposes by certain groups/organisations/peoples because of the media coverage it been giving. Feminism started in Canada because womens wanted property rights, right to vote and access to higher education. Feminism is advocacy for political, economic and social equality of the sexes. Real feminists are not against consensual sex work.

The biggest groups going against SW are feminists. They say that men wanting sex and especially those that pay for it are predators and the women are victims. Look at the advertisement every year during Grand Prix about the anti-prostitution campaign, it is being pushed by feminist organizations.

Unfortunately, some women/groups are going after sex work in the name of feminism, which is totally wrong and goes after anything feminism is about and promote. It's dangerous and destructive for the cause of real feminism. All do, some groups or people are fighting about human trafficking and minor prostitution, which for me, goes into the category of feminism because its exploitation; but fighting about consensual sex work is not and will never be a feminism cause.

 

[Valentina Amante]

Taking money from rich men is actually the logical thing to do in this situation.
When forced to play a game, might as well play it well.

This “game” can lead to a very slippery slope real quick.

Just because a woman chooses to monetize her body doesn’t automatically make it empowering - despite what some white knights and YASSS QUEEN feminists like to believe.

A lot of women in this industry quietly struggle because they’re working in environments built to please men while carrying deep personal trauma, resentment, or anger caused by their negative experiences with men. It’s a contradiction that relies on male attention + money while simultaneously resenting them. That kind of survival rarely feels like true empowerment to them in the end - especially when it leads to depression, anxiety, panic attacks, etc. (Some have reached out to me on the DL saying that they were in denial for the longest time and fear to leave these groups because of the judgment they may face. It’s not as feminist as it claims to be at times and it’s actually very one-sided. There’s a lot of pressure to conform, and not much space for open dialogue or diverse perspectives contrary to what they make it seem to be).

Also, many turn around and guilt-trip others - especially men - for the risks and dangers associated to the very work they chose. It’s like lighting a match in a dry forest and blaming the wind when it catches fire.

Meanwhile, the women actually doing the work - quietly and consistently - aren’t out there writing telenovelas on forums 24/7 or posting performative tweets about how desired they are. They carry themselves with more humility and don’t try to turn their job into a self-serving spectacle.

the top experts on the subject are sex workers themselves who usually don't want to be in the spotlight.

^^ one thing you’re right about Du Con