Nice la Presse Article on XO this morning
- Thread starter felixLg
- Start date
Don't think calling someone gay is "shaming" them. (But that's aother topic)
Great find. See not all things are black and white the way the media like to protray it. This man clearly was not there seeking a minor but he was lied to. This is something to learn from whenever going on Seeking or any other site make sure to to ensure the girl is not a minor.
You totally missed my point.That is not something I've said, at all. I also have an issue with female pimps and know that male victims also exist. Argument rejeté
One minor is already too much and this isn't the only thing that went wrong. But we're going in circles. You (not all men, let me be clear) are part of the 2nd group of people I mentioned earlier, clearly. There's no point continuing this conversation as you won't change my mind and I won't change yours
Acquittement d’un « sugar daddy » | La juge dénonce une « banalisation inquiétante de la prostitution »
C’est l’histoire d’une ado de 15 ans qui ment pour se faire de l’argent rapidement et d’un « sugar daddy » prêt à « soutenir » une « sugar baby » pour du sexe. Mais c’est surtout une illustration malheureuse de la « banalisation inquiétante de la prostitution et de la glorification de la...
www.lapresse.ca
^^^^ This article posted by Anthony is the kind of thing I am talking about.
You totally missed my point.
Acquittement d’un « sugar daddy » | La juge dénonce une « banalisation inquiétante de la prostitution »
C’est l’histoire d’une ado de 15 ans qui ment pour se faire de l’argent rapidement et d’un « sugar daddy » prêt à « soutenir » une « sugar baby » pour du sexe. Mais c’est surtout une illustration malheureuse de la « banalisation inquiétante de la prostitution et de la glorification de la...
^^^^ This article posted by Anthony is the kind of thing I am talking about.
You'd think someone operating a prostitution agency would ask for ID and take steps to ensure said ID is legit. This article talks about a sugar daddy believing words he was told, which isn't the same situation as a pimp being utterly careless. Both situations suck but they are not comparable
Last edited:
I second that, it bugs my mind
How were they able to have the 3 male undercovers aligned perfectly as to allow the female undercover to call it a day?
One thing is sure, it then would means 3-4 hours to document a lot, take pictures etc... and even having a ... 4some lol
option 1: she somehow feels sick and cancel the regular John
option 2: Fuck the police, fuck the— fuck the—
Reread my OP. As in the case of O'Gascon, they checked IDs and they ask the girls to show two IDs which is the norm of for most stripclubs but the girl had a very well made fake IDs. You do know it is not hard to get a fake ID from the black market? So how is it the club's fault? They still got penalized. As for XO, the details on that is missing and I doubt it will be released.
Not reading the comments is self care, I think I've made my opinion clear enough. Have a lovely day everyone!
Undercover escort knew her schedule in advance the the UC clients refreshed the schedule at 10 pm (like some of our esteemed colleagues do) to get the first three slots. If there was a regular client who managed to get a slot she could have refused him for X reason. Less likely but possible, they infiltrated the agency and there was an undercover booker.I second that, it bugs my mind
How were they able to have the 3 male undercovers aligned perfectly as to allow the female undercover to call it a day?
One thing is sure, it then would means 3-4 hours to document a lot, take pictures etc... and even having a ... 4some lol
Kinda of a rook
Kinda of a rookie mistake, experienced agencies always test the new girl with trusted clients....for many reasons...I feel like the cops had other moves or tools that are keeping secret
I don't know how much this trusted client scenario can work
the policewoman just needs to record the client giving her the envelope with the money, then get in the washroom and call the cavalry,
the cops would get in in minutes and get the john; enough to prove there is prostitution happening there
They also make things convenient for clients and providers.
Some stars at agencies pop on a few hours a month, do no pr/marketing and collect a good pay for tough work but without the toil of renting a place, hosting, dealing with non-serious customers, etc.
Agencies at time do block problematic customers which benefits providers…
Except the normal process here is payment afterwards. There was only 1 XO girl in my encounters asking for money upfront and we did engage in expected services so she wasn't undercover.
Note to self, walk away if she demands payment upfront.
No need.
A new thread has just appeared for the purpose of collecting it!
Thread 'Recherche de témoignages d'hommes utilisateurs de services d'escortes - Région de Québec
no charges filed relating to the underage victim from 2017? Insufficient evidence?
This entire industry is an underbelly if you go strictly by LE.
There are truly dangerous elements that involve coercion, narcotics, trafficking, etc which seem to be the target of efforts like this investigation.
Then there is everybody else. A zealous prosecutor could nail anyone to the wall or, even without a conviction, drag someone thru the mud and ruin them.
On the John's side, the culpability seems clear. However, I don't see the impetus to pursue any of us unless you are world famous or are engaged in something truly nefarious.
not anyone on the supply side (indy or agency) is probably paying taxes. There are years of financial crimes, tax evasion, money laundering that could catch up. Ever facilitated a duo? That seems like it could be construed as procurement. But it's allot of work to pursue things like that for very little gain.
Great article, but it seems incomplete. To me, it seems like the other shoe is yet to drop.
This entire industry is an underbelly if you go strictly by LE.
There are truly dangerous elements that involve coercion, narcotics, trafficking, etc which seem to be the target of efforts like this investigation.
Then there is everybody else. A zealous prosecutor could nail anyone to the wall or, even without a conviction, drag someone thru the mud and ruin them.
On the John's side, the culpability seems clear. However, I don't see the impetus to pursue any of us unless you are world famous or are engaged in something truly nefarious.
not anyone on the supply side (indy or agency) is probably paying taxes. There are years of financial crimes, tax evasion, money laundering that could catch up. Ever facilitated a duo? That seems like it could be construed as procurement. But it's allot of work to pursue things like that for very little gain.
Great article, but it seems incomplete. To me, it seems like the other shoe is yet to drop.
I'm sure a lot has been left out in the article. But only thing that illustrates is XO booked three guys to go to a room and give a woman cash. Short of LE recording the john discussing a quid-pro-quo and then handling the cash, this is not slam dunk.I second that, it bugs my mind
How were they able to have the 3 male undercovers aligned perfectly as to allow the female undercover to call it a day?
One thing is sure, it then would means 3-4 hours to document a lot, take pictures etc... and even having a ... 4some lol
My own communications with XO has always been is <her name> available at 6PM? That's it. Nothing else discussed; no services, no price mentioned.
Trafficking a minor is completely separate from my point. If they did allegedly do that, they should be prosecuted for it.
Similar threads
