You didn't answer the question. In your estimation, should an escort provide the same level of service to a hygienic vs unhygienic client? Respectful vs disrespectful?
How likely are you to report a bad hobbying experience?
- Thread starter islandersfan91
- Start date
That was not even my point. She is not required to in fact she can refuse the client. But that was not even the subject of this thread. You can make a new thread if you want to discuss this. I am not interested in White Knighting.
Again you are insinuating something that you are not privy to.
If you were there holding a candle while they were fucking or if you have seen that SP several times before and had a different experience then you have a valid point.
Otherwise you are contributing white knight bullshit fluff, nothing else.
Does that answer your question lol.
No, but in all not-due respect, I don't think we operate on the same level of analysis
To summarize: I am confident in my belief that a large fraction of bad reviews have their root cause in the client's poor hygiene, lack of respect or general bad behavior. I rest my case.
Why don’t you rest your case when you have the tinniest of information about that client or what really went on during their session.
Nobody needs a white knight’s summary of potential bad hygiene and bad behaviour when he knows fuck all of what happened during that session.
.
For all you know the SP could have had a stinky pussy and a bad attitude, but according to you that could never happen in a million years the client has to be the one at fault or at least probably is.
I report it all the time, so people save their money.
I am not talking about the hickey story here. Re-read the quoted post. It's a global analysis informed by having spent (way too much) time reading/analyzing reviews (good and bad) and extensive conversations with more than one well-connected sex workers. Again, ask yourself why you have had only good experiences and others always seem to have bad ones. Not to mention those that seem excited at the prospect of reading bad reviews.
It is useless to try to rationalize things with you.
Bottom line if you never saw the lady before and can’t contribute based on personal knowledge then you have zero to contribute to that review or to that guys experience.
Nobody is interested in your personal pre conceived beliefs or statistical analysis.
Even if you saw her before the only thing you can say is that your experience was different and pleasant and describe it if that was the case as you have no idea what went on in the other guys session and the reason he may have had a bad experience.
Ever heard of a woman having a bad day a “ headache” maybe. Ask some married guys there are all kinds of statistics on it, some might even say it is a reason for seeing SP.
They're not talking about the hickey story either. They're also not talking about the hygiene issue. That's what you're talking about, and what you say may very well be true, but it's not what they were talking about and it's not what the thread is originally discussing either, and that's what they're trying to say to you and the point they're trying to go back to. You guys are arguing across points and at cross purposes to each other so of course you're not going to come to an agreement or a meeting of the minds. The fact is that neither viewpoint need necessarily be either correct or incorrect because the issues aren't aligned, but rather that the issues should be taken into account separately and discussed that way, rather than the apples and oranges happening here. Somebody, it may have been @Fradi but I can't be arsed to go back and look, suggested that a separate thread be opened if you want to get into specific underlying causes of the other issues so that they can be handled properly, otherwise you might as well be in a politics thread, where everybody yells at everybody else, nobody hears anything, nothing substantial is discussed in any meaningful way and no agreements are reached.
I probably shouldn't have said anything, but these kinds of discussions frustrate the shit out of me.
It is revealing that you still refuse to adress the following point: why do you accumulate good experiences while other accumulate bad ones? Are you so obsessed with the ill-invoked (here) concept of white knight to admit that good client behavior/hygiene strongly predicts good service, and that the opposite is also true?
Indeed. I got carried away because I am fed up with the dyspeptic discourse of these two members.
Good client behaviour and bad client behaviour belongs in a thread about client behaviour not in an SP individual review thread.
To answer your question I know exactly why I have good experiences with SP.
First I do my homework and pick ones with a solid reputation.
Second I treat them with respect and kindness as every woman should be treated.
Plus I pay them and tip them and bring them wine and pastries and Hygiene is never an issue so it is not rocket science why I have good experiences.
That does not ,mean that I will always have good experiences and if I don’t and report it I certainly don’t want someone reciting statistics and hygiene and why I might be the one at fault when he was not there and knows fuck all of what happened between us.
So you are arguing because you don’t happen to like 2 members.
I never would have guessed lol.
So all the things you said about hygiene bla bla bla was just a pretext to attack Merb members that you dislike and don’t agree with generally.
That says a lot about you.
It was the trigger, not the pretext. When someone talks about bad reviews as a way of "holding escorts accountable", don't be surprised if react strongly. None of my arguments were refuted, by the way. You clearly don't understand statistical reasoning. I've had enough.
Okay but all this "the client is always right" aside... What if a client arrives smelling like shit, refuses to shower, has a bleeding cock, calls me names, insults my grandmother, has only half the payment, or or or...
...Is it still my duty to give him service, and if yes, to give him my usual level of service? Should I risk it all to avoid a bad review? Am I the one that needs to be held accountable in this scenario?
He mentioned repulsive factors and you all heard "escorts often suck" smh
I for one am glad you said something. I enjoy reading your posts, they're often the voice of reason in divisive threads, and always well written, too. lol
Insulting your grandmother is grounds for blacklisting that prick everywhere.
Seriously though I think we all know that there are scumbag clients and it is not always the fault of the SP and all the possible reasons why when a bad review is written.
I think that easily comes out in an SP review thread as there is a history of reviews and a history of the reviewer also and I hope most guys can do a reasonable and fair evaluation.
Why is it that you have so many fantastic reviews and none complaining about you.
Simply because not only are you an amazingly skilled provider but a fabulously kind and nice person and every moment with you is a pleasure.
I can vouch for this as I have said it several times in your review thread also.
I will tell you the same thing that I told Anthony, by all means you can deny him the service. That is why we need more and more reviews. Because some SPs have a pattern of giving bad service. Many SPs are using the hygiene excuse to deny certain services. What about the one that takes advantage of shy clients and talks the whole time? Or the scammer? And I got many reports from backchannels of some SPs with a stinky pussy and were too afraid to post it in public. That is the purpose of the review board. And remember it is not the client giving the service. This is a review board for clients to share intel.
I see it a bit like reporting a bad Uber experience—it can really impact someone, and for them it might be a lifeline for income. I tend to report scams or leave negative reviews only when something genuinely seems false or misleading.
So, yes, I can deny service if the client is unhygienic, dangerous or rude. But if I do I'm a bitch and need to be held accountable. En résumé : you think the client is never at fault.
Im going to fire a client today thanks to this thread. <3 Now I can be held accountable for something lol
