The porn dude
Montreal Escorts

Hiking in Nova Scotia is now illegal - fine of $25,000

Is this a violation of Canadian rights and freedoms?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 60.0%
  • No

    Votes: 6 40.0%

  • Total voters
    15
  • This poll will close: .

coquin105

Member
Aug 12, 2016
48
73
18
I said some years ago that the next thing after covid mandates will be climate lockdowns. Liberals voters did not believe me. Well the facts tell another story. This is first step towards climate lockdowns. It is coming. It will start with restrictions, then mandates, government overreach, then lockdowns
 

Valentina Amante

乇乂丅尺卂 丅卄工匚匚 ( ‿ 人 ‿ )
Sep 28, 2023
740
2,553
93
Terrebonne
www.valentinaamante.com
I said some years ago that the next thing after covid mandates will be climate lockdowns. Liberals voters did not believe me. Well the facts tell another story. This is first step towards climate lockdowns. It is coming. It will start with restrictions, then mandates, government overreach, then lockdowns
Everyone tells us we were right years later hahaha. They just can’t seem to not get sources other than liberal funded ones.
 

Valentina Amante

乇乂丅尺卂 丅卄工匚匚 ( ‿ 人 ‿ )
Sep 28, 2023
740
2,553
93
Terrebonne
www.valentinaamante.com
La proposition de Trump visant à nous annexer aux États-Unis devient de plus en plus séduisante ...

Oui et non.

Oui, à cause du dollar et du climat politique pourri comparé à ici.

Non parce que je ne voudrais pas abandonner mon pays et recevoir des aumônes de quelqu’un ou d’un autre pays. Ils auraient alors plus de pouvoir sur les décisions futures au Canada. Je ne voudrais pas non plus que mon pays et ma culture soient oubliés et éradiqués.

Non parce que ce serait plus facile de contrôler les masses - après Trump, on ne sait pas qui sera aux commandes. Ça fait déjà peur avec ce qui se passe au Royaume-Uni (censure d’internet, etc.).

Si on devient le 51ᵉ État… on sera plus pauvres que l’État le plus pauvre des États-Unis actuellement:

IMG_7939.jpeg


Tout ça pour dire. Jte feel anyways ❤️ je commence à être fatigué en criss pis j’m’en caliss un peu de vouloir aider ou de « sauver » le Canada. Ça fait des années que je me bat (sur des comptes personnels :p) contre l’état dictature. Y’a rien à faire, tout le monde dort au gaz ici. La mentalité de moutons fait honte. C’est comme s’ils ne sont pas au courant que le monde entier nous regarde en ce moment et rit de nous hahaha.
 

vwjf

Active Member
Aug 29, 2003
221
227
43
Visit site
Here is my personal opinion:

I thought climate change was the main cause of the fires in Canada but banning human activities like hiking and fishing will prevent … wild fires?

So which is it: Climate change or human activity? And seriously, how does fishing start a forest fire?

Multiple people were caught STARTING fires - (most recent example is in LA) and many other places including Québec and Italy. (Drone footage was caught of people starting fires that ruined acres of land).

Again, IMO, this is about control and land grabs. They want to force people to stay confined in cities and discourage anyone from going off-grid or living independently in the woods. It’s the same agenda behind pushing green vehicles while trying to ban gas-powered cars.

I’m sorry, but someone please explain to me like I’m five: how is using child slaves to mine lithium for your EV batteries somehow better for the environment - especially when those same batteries, once they explode or degrade, putrefy the soil and take years to break down, leaving behind toxic waste?

Legacy media keeps telling everyone to trust the “sCiEnCe”: The same way hikers spread covid, they spread climate change lol.

Feel free to chime in. Healthy debate is always welcome.
They are not mutually exclusive.

Climate change makes the conditions in which human activity increases the risk of fire.

As a rural and semi rural firefighter in a highly sought-after camping area both organized and back country , most fires are due to stupid human activities, and the dry conditions only hastens the propagation and amplitude.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,693
5,092
113
They are not mutually exclusive.

Climate change makes the conditions in which human activity increases the risk of fire.

As a rural and semi rural firefighter in a highly sought-after camping area both organized and back country , most fires are due to stupid human activities, and the dry conditions only hastens the propagation and amplitude.
But the thing is governments everywhere under the orders of the United Nations are actively increasing the population via giving many financial benefits because they want to make more money. But the more ppl you have, the more faster you have climate change and more human caused forest fires. Much of the terrain has been razed to house more humans. First step to reduce climate change and forest fires is to slow down population growth. We got 8.5 billion humans on this planet, that is very scary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Womaniser

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
21,449
4,059
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Meanwhile we are all breathing shit air. I was on vacation in upstate NY last week and the sky on Friday looked unnatural and the air smelled like shit. When is this going to stop? Am I going to get lung cancer from breathing second hand smoke from wildfires?
 
Ashley Madison