Search results

"I would have appreciated an inch or more in depth of insertion of the tongue, and a twirling motion that is a bit faster in order to satisfy my need for DFK" #joke

En toute honnêteté, l'intention est probablement bonne, mais je ressens un malaise à la lecture de votre annonce. On dirait quasiment que c'est vous qui voulez offrir vos services à la personne que vous cherchez à engager...Avez-vous fait vos recherches sur les sites de petites annonces...

It was the trigger, not the pretext. When someone talks about bad reviews as a way of "holding escorts accountable", don't be surprised if react strongly. None of my arguments were refuted, by the way. You clearly don't understand statistical reasoning. I've had enough.

Indeed. I got carried away because I am fed up with the dyspeptic discourse of these two members.

It is revealing that you still refuse to adress the following point: why do you accumulate good experiences while other accumulate bad ones? Are you so obsessed with the ill-invoked (here) concept of white knight to admit that good client behavior/hygiene strongly predicts good service, and that...

I am not talking about the hickey story here. Re-read the quoted post. It's a global analysis informed by having spent (way too much) time reading/analyzing reviews (good and bad) and extensive conversations with more than one well-connected sex workers. Again, ask yourself why you have had only...

No, but in all not-due respect, I don't think we operate on the same level of analysis To summarize: I am confident in my belief that a large fraction of bad reviews have their root cause in the client's poor hygiene, lack of respect or general bad behavior. I rest my case.

You didn't answer the question. In your estimation, should an escort provide the same level of service to a hygienic vs unhygienic client? Respectful vs disrespectful?

You didn't answer the question.

It doesn't seem to register with you that the service that sex workers provide does not have anything to do in substance with any other service that we use, such that the ones of an accountant or a barber.

Ask yourself why you never had a bad experience and others seem to accumulate bad experiences.

Should clients be held accountable for their lack of hygiene, lack of respect, and general bad behavior which are often the root cause of a disappointing encounter? Do you expect sex workers to act as robots and be insensitive to these repulsive factors? Because when I talk with actual sex...

Bingo. The fatal flaw in modern sociological thought is believing that humans are infinitely malleable, while we are constrained by the bounds of human nature.

All the different bird songs that I can hear from my window this morning.

There seems to be a consensus among well-informed and respectful members on the following points: Sex workers are not inherently bad persons Infrequent use of paid services is not problematic Frequent use of paid services over months or years can turn into an addiction and cause significant...

In recent months it seems to me that the quality of advice on this board is increasing, through the contributions of well-informed and respectful members.

When it comes to addictions, the consensus is that a group-based setting is generally a better option than individual therapy–although the latter can definitely be a complement for concurring anxiety or depression. I don't know if there is a Sex Addicts Anonymous group in Montreal, but it's...

If we take the word "demographic" literally, I would say that it's quite the opposite: we have people from a vast age range, from different ethnicities and levels of education. My view on the situation is that most of our disagreements here are actually generational, and to a lesser extent...

They got sued by Mattel (the "Barbie" doll) in the early 2000's. They appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court. Mattel lost. A reasonable consumer would not be confused between the two brands Supreme Court rules against Mattel in Barbie trademark case | CBC News...

Ask ChatGPT. (Not a joke). Here's the short version: