Euphoria agency in the news
- Thread starter ktm
- Start date
thats what I think too. The policeman kinda hinted at that in the article.
I also find the naming of James by his full name seems unusual, like its personnal to the reporter. But I guess acceptable by local journalism standards. I mean the journalist has recorded proof.
Of course, but the logic is that if we simply give every provider and client lethal injection as deterrence or better yet, lock up every woman in a room in their father or husband’s home and only allow women outside escorted by family, there would be no harm from prostitution as there would be no prostitution. We all know there is no prostitution in Saudi Arabia because of protective laws like these. I think science could solve this problem. We simply need to eliminate the female gender altogether and develop an artificial surrogacy womb for reproduction. Then all men will have the freedom to walk around unencumbered by the female gaze shirtless and oiled up.
Je pense que toutes les agences sont à risque de passer sous le bistouri de se faire disséquer comme XO et Euphoria. Mais bon, c’est tellement plus safe et privé de dealer avec une agence comme vous le dites …
Merb will still book. Agencies i think have a huge merb clientele . But outside of merb as well people book. As far as euphoria goes i highly doubt its gonna close all of a sudden . They still have girls on schedule , some times havent changed today but yea . Will see what happens i guess
All publicity is good publicity. There's no such thing as bad publicity. There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.
No, the logic is that conservative men want to benefit from prostitution but they don't want prostitutes to have any agency and they want us to be punished and have nowhere to go. People like Donald Trump made Fosta Sesta happen, and we all know he is a rapist and a pedophile and probably has seen a number of sex workers in his life. Even on this board a lot of men display conservative values and if you read through this thread I've already seen a lot of statements that are derogatory towards sex workers here alone.
They also want it to seem like they are catering to ''good christian values'', by encouraging women to be ''traditional wives'', and by punishing anyone who strays from that. In the United States, historically, sex workers have been convicted far more often than clients. Even here, street workers reported being constantly harassed by the police in the 90's and 2000's because they ''disturb the public''.
This isn't about wanting to prevent men from wanting to have sex with women.. it's about control of what women are supposed to do, and how they are allowed to make money. All those women who choose to do sex work instead of cheap labor, are not doing the cheap labor. They are ''out of control''
They do that to cater to their voter base. They will do what the voters want. They only care to be relected. But remember far-left governments are just as bad. The feminists are also against sex work, they vilify men and infantile women.
I just read one girl on Euphoria's website has a new addition restrictions, no DFK. First time I see this. So it seems agencies give the girls a lot of leeway.
The majority of the client base is White so if they got girls who refuse to see Black or Brown clients it will not affect their bottom line.
Not all feminists are against sex work, and it's inherently conservative and misinformed to impose these restrictions on sex work even if it comes from a more liberal government, because it harms marginalized women & people generally, and promotes an ideal of women being ''sexually pure'' and conforming to the norm. There is no such thing as a far left government party here btw .. if a left leaning government has a policy like this, it comes from conservatism. Not all feminism is equal. Some feminism is actually more aligned with certain conservative values actually. That's usually the type of feminism that is against giving rights to sex workers.
Good to know about the restrictions, it's good for girls to be able to choose what they want to do and what they don't want to do.
And yes maybe that's why those restrictions are in place, because most clients are white.. This isn't the case at massage parlors.. and as an indy I see black and brown clients quite often too. So this isn't because they care that much about consent.. also like I've observed before on this review board, it seems like some people in the industry only care about choice and consent when it comes to not wanting to see black and brown men, which is ridiculous.
Last edited:
Are you sure about that? Every year during the Grand Prix the media is pushing the anti-prostitution ads and it is coming from a Feminist organizations, there is one big one I forget the name I would have to look it up. Many feminists already got very misandrist tendencies. Conservative or Liberal I said it many times both are against sex work. Policies come from both Conservative and Progressive governments. The Liberals who were in power since 2015 did nothing to repeal Bill C-36.
Now you see my point the agencies do give the girls leeway and they are free to quit whenever they want. But at the end the girl has to get calls if with those restrictions the girl does not get booked the agency sooner or later will let her go.
Your last part of the sentence I agree with 100%.
Which feminist organizations? A lot of these organizations are not really ''feminist organizations''. They are supposedly ''anti trafficking organizations'', that's not the same as a ''feminist organization''. And a lot of them are misinformed, they target the entire industry instead of actually trying to educate the public about trafficking and they conflate a lot of different things. They claim to want to protect young girls but at the end of the day that's not what their true goal is. None of these organizations actually provide any substantial help for women who want to leave the industry or for trafficking victims.
Abolitionism ultimately is about punishing women who enter the sex trade mostly, because in a fully criminalized system more sex workers than clients will be arrested and punished, if you look at the United States as an example. This has nothing to do with ''misandry''. A lot of men are abolitionist in theory, and will still use the services of sex workers. A lot of men build entire platforms online by interviewing miserable ex prostitutes & trafficking victims, and painting this industry in a terrible light. Many men participate in these ads, campaigns, interviews etc too.
Last edited:
Horaire | ICI Télé | Radio-Canada
Consultez l'horaire télé et l'horaire cinéma pour connaître les heures de diffusion de vos émissions préférées et des films à venir.
ici.radio-canada.ca
pour ne pas manquer "enquête" ce soir à 21h
Au fait l'article de ce matin est maintenant enterré très bas sur la page de Radiocan
Et amusant, la section commentaires (qui n'était vraiment pas aussi négative que ce torchon d'article) est .. fermée ! LOL
CLES is its name. Look it up. It is a 100% pure feminist organization with zero influence from Conservatives. They operate under Radical Feminism and Abolitionist Feminist. They are a big player in pushing anti-prostitution campaigns. A lot of these women hold misandrist beliefs and same for many SWs. They will bash men and put them down on social media but will see see them as clients. I find it weird how some of these women clearly have contempt for men but at the same time are working as escorts to see male clients. You can protect women from being sexually exploited and trafficked without making all men as being predators for wanting to have sex and all women as helpless infants.
You mean like some in this chat ?
Euphoria website is currently down and it sucks if they gonna close... I hope they rebound in some form. I suppose the current iteration is "toast" because they revealed where are the incalls etc.
If James decide to stay open he will have to find a new place to assure discretion. I mean so far he has not been arrested or anything.
But if journalists can so easily compromise agencies ... Man this is worrying.
If James decide to stay open he will have to find a new place to assure discretion. I mean so far he has not been arrested or anything.
But if journalists can so easily compromise agencies ... Man this is worrying.
And this is the worst thing that could’ve happened as a result. Now, 30+ girls are left without their jobs or side income. This is unbelievable.
Journalists are not “compromising” agencies. They’re reporting things that everyone already knows. Don’t get me wrong : situations were violence and assault are reported should be managed. But this?
This is not the way to regulate the situation.
The same thing happened in Laval around 2016–2017. They shut down all the MPs right around Christmas.
How hypocritical to portray themselves as “people who want to help women” while causing them this much distress and taking away their source of income.
I am absolutely baffled.
Journalists are not “compromising” agencies. They’re reporting things that everyone already knows. Don’t get me wrong : situations were violence and assault are reported should be managed. But this?
This is not the way to regulate the situation.
The same thing happened in Laval around 2016–2017. They shut down all the MPs right around Christmas.
How hypocritical to portray themselves as “people who want to help women” while causing them this much distress and taking away their source of income.
I am absolutely baffled.
I briefly looked at their website... I don't want to look into it too much... and yes they claim to be a feminist organization. But I'm not talking about ''conservatives'' as in the conservative party. I meant that it is inherently conservative in values to be against sex work. Radical feminism isn't all feminism. I don't see anything on this website that is about hating men. However, they are conflating consensual sex work with trafficking.
And yes, we can protect women from being exploited and trafficked without saying all men are predators...... That's what I've been saying. Also yes what is called ''radical feminism'' is kinda conservative because it holds the belief that men are inherently predatory and women are helpless infants who have no agency. That is a conservative belief at it's core. Saying that men can't control themselves around women and respect them is conservative. Saying women are helpless and infantile also is conservative.
Last edited:
Similar threads
