Review Thread titles: clean or Broadway style?

[Lionelmessi]

We’ve seen thread titles with just SP@agency and others that look like Broadway posters with add-ons, like:

• SP@Agency – A star is born
• SP@Agency – WOW
• SP@Agency – The new spinner and rising star

Personally, I think keeping titles simple (just the SP@agency) makes it look more neutral, avoids bias or over-hyping, and keeps things fair for everyone.

 

[Giselle Montreal]

I agree with you. I don't know if I should participate in this thread. But I said it a few times on this board, it's upsetting to see "she's not worth it, disgusting experience" next to a name, because when they get positive reviews, they are probably overlooked, her "reputation" being concluded by one member. Biased and leaving no room for different opinions and experiences.

I forgot to add that on the other boards, providers have one new thread per review. It would be OK to add the comment of your choice, a resume of the experience. But here, since we have one thread for all our reviews, it would be more fair to keep it the title without personal comments.

 

[What's My Name]

We’ve seen thread titles with just SP@agency and others that look like Broadway posters with add-ons, like:

• SP@Agency – A star is born
• SP@Agency – WOW
• SP@Agency – The new spinner and rising star

Personally, I think keeping titles simple (just the SP@agency) makes it look more neutral, avoids bias or over-hyping, and keeps things fair for everyone.

that should be mentionded when doing the review, I am okay with the WOW