Search results

Bogus You can't believe everything you see on Youtube...:cool: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZMteezqDlE&NR=1

For your information: 2) Forbidden Activities: viii) Disclosing private communications. PMs are to remain PRIVATE between the 2 parties, and not disclosed without the consent of the sender. PMs may be forwarded and disclosed to Moderators if they contain anything offensive or require the...

A link would be nice... for lazy guys like me.:rolleyes:

I used it to send a text message (from my computer) to a lady I needed to contact. And the link provided did not give me her name or address, just the phone company which is what I needed. Actually I have never seen the name of anyone appear using that site, just the phone company.

Thanks guys!;)

Hey guys and gals, I did a search and couldn't find the site I am looking for. I asked a few months back in some tech thread in the lounge, if it was possible to find out which cell phone company was associated with a particular phone number and someone here posted a link to a website which...

Great post Oliver. Summed it up pretty dam well!

Of course it is... a small group of bums (some underaged as per SPVM) burnt down some cop cars because half of the city has Canadiens' flags on their cars! Real smart... It is quite obvious from the images we saw last night on TV and from the police reports and various news reports this...

Geeeez you ladies are scaring me!!!:eek: In order to score so high you surely must've answered yes in some of the animal questions?!?!? Let me think... which SP has a pet? :rolleyes:

I'm so stuck up!!! I got a 357...:D I have kinky playful tendencies

EB, I mentionned (a few time allready... ok it might have been in french) that I noticed afterwards that no names were mentionned in Clavie's post. This thread was started to engage in a general debate on the situation of SP's posting in review threads, not to discuss Clavie's thread.

I think I have mind reading abilities. From my post #13 earlyer today: :rolleyes:

Agreed. Noticed it afterwards (see my reply to Amélie earlyer today). IMO, point 5 should be posted in that thread, not here.

Bon point! Tu vois que je ne suis pas de mauvaise foi...moi!;) Mais le débat doit quand même avoir lieu. Il faut clarifier la pôlitique de Merb là-dessus.

Please lets keep this thread CIVIL. This is not a witch hunt against SP's that we all like and appreciate. We simply need to clarify this particular situation of SP's posting in review threads that don't concern them. Thanks to all, keep your posts coming...

Tu n'as pas à t'excuser, il n'y a pas (encore) de règles claires là-dessus (à ce que je sache). Merci de ta réponse et surtout de prendre le temps de comprendre le sense de mon post et du débat. Bravo!

En plus du mélodramatique (liberté d'expression), maintenant tu vas me sortir la conspiration des Merbites pour se débarasser de vous!!! T'es vraiment qqchose toi! Regarde comme Aly a bien compris le sens de mon post et elle n'y a vu AUCUNE agressivité. Puisque tu ne sembles pas bien savoir...

Aucun rapport! d'accord à 100%. Mais discutons dans le lounge et non pas dans le review thread d'un client. C'est ça mon point.

Tu es libre de t'exprimer dans toutes les autres sections. C'est pas assez pour toi? En passant ne tombons pas dans le mélodramatique de la liberté d'expression. On n'est pas à Cuba ici, on est sur Merb!

I think mods should serioulsy study a recent tendancy here on Merb. Like here for example. A review by an incall lady that mentions the the guy got "screwed" by 20$. Then follows a discussion by two SP`s on how they also get "screwed" by clients and their methods to prevent that... I believe...