Search results

That we do, indeed. Now more than ever. It certainly looks like we have very different Canadian friends. Mine, especially those who were unfortunate enough to develop serious problems, keep sharing with me their (sometimes quite ingenious) schemes as to how they could possibly get treated at...

Yes, you (whether royal or not) do keep giving us evidence -- in spades. And no, you are wrong, I for one never refuse to read it. Quite the contrary, I always pay utmost attention to it. Just recently I quoted -- with respectful admiration -- quite a few of your posts. Or perhaps consider...

Well, maybe Masha is right after all, and Mayor Pete is indeed a politician first and foremost? All his other attributes be damned -- gay, liberal,..., whatever.

Yes, I know, it is annoying as hell that this thread is also open to people who are actually known to make sense, at least occasionally. I feel your pain. I am very glad to hear that. There is always a first time for everything.

A renowned New Yorker intellectual Masha Gessen has let us in on an important secret: as it happens, Pete Buttigieg is neither young nor liberal nor gay. You learn something new every day. https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-queer-opposition-to-pete-buttigieg-explained In her...

Those who can read might have concluded that my references were to WITNESSES. That were absent from the proceedings altogether, if we are to believe jalimon. Thank you for setting us straight though. And thank you for your heartwarming compliment. I am always trying my best.

Right on point as always. Long live President H.Clinton!

Absolutely true. Some people's "reasoning" goes exactly like this. We even have some right here among us. Works just fine when it supports your cause, doesn't it? And of course we can be sure as hell that this gentleman is not joking. He never does.

Move on??? From Trump's impeachment? Are you kidding or what?

You got that right. The quiz is next week.

I am devastated to hear that. Any chance I could still win you over?

Hawking was someone who definitely deserved a lot of respect. For his considerable achievements under the direst of circumstances. As for his uninformed opinions on matters he was not familiar with -- well, maybe not so much.

Must be seasonal... I for one hope that jalimon that we all love and respect will be back soon.

I would say Bloomberg is a little naive if he hopes to beat Trump at that sort of game.

Yes, and a truly representative sample of the kind at that.

What kind of gibberish is that? I always assume someone I support is guilty? Say again? Reading is not your strong suit, that much we have established by now. And neither is courtesy, obviously. And thank you for your kind permission, much appreciated.

And you know that how? What was Bolton going to say? Did he discuss with you his testimony? This was never about politics. This was about selling a book.

Can you read by any chance? This very issue was discussed to death in this thread, so sorry we didn't wait for your arrival. The conclusion: Rubio never said Trump was guilty. Have a minimum courtesy to look it up before starting on a second round. Assuming that your other "arguments" are...

That's right. They decided they heard from enough witnesses already. The voted to block any additional witnesses.

Why won't you try to take a look at the news headlines once in a while, you even might find it interesting, who knows. Trump fires Gordon Sondland, the second impeachment witness to be removed from his post Friday Trump defends firing impeachment witness Alexander Vindman And so on...