Search results

Don't put word in my mouth please. My question was: How do you know that she is not being taken advantage because of a drug habit? She may be or may not be. Just do not automatically assume that this is consenting sex. Some people argue that this act is not degrading because it is "consenting"...

I wish that you said so in your first post! How do you know that she is consenting? I agree. Degrading for anybody at the receiving end of a gang bang. Again, how do you know that she is consenting? May be she was forced into this degrading act because some slizzy people took advantage of...

Degrading Gang bang is absolutely degrading to women. IMHO, because it invites people to "make history" and because it says "it worth checking out" this thread is even more insulting. ..But in the respect of free speech....

There were more than 1 review on this board recounting SOG/MSOG with SPs who were high on something. It was not funny but nobody ranted about it. Why so?:confused:

You may be offended by Mods comment about closing the thread. In the past you were fiercy independent in your thinking/behavior.;)

I have a feeling that ZM will delete this thread before it will be closed by the Mods.

To be fair to the MOds: 1) Ziggy left voluntarily, asked for all his posts to be removed and never said why 2) Ziggy, while arguing with Tom on the other Board (in the thread "Why Ziggy is banned on Me*c" started and deleted by Tom) said that he was disgused with the Merb administrative team and...

Wimpy? or rather "Hummering" lizard.

I think it's about time for this thread to be closed. Mod, what do you think? P.S. Keampferrand, (Geez such a difficult name to pronounce), I hope you loose.

Well, let's see how many under-21 Sps have caught the attention of GG since last week? How can we "enforce this rule" if GG keeps doing the cheer-leading, promotion, encouragement and showing his desire for the 18, 19, 20 y-o SPs? (not even counting GG's review of Samantha) Michelle of...

This sentence is a threat to the protection of personal privacy of other.:mad: You already did it, expose people you don't like, did you not, GG, Mr Inquisitor?

I know, I know. Thank you for the reminding me.:D Btw, welcome back. We missed you.

GG, you bully you. 1) I was replying to HonestAbe 2) I am not the only one who views your attitude as hypocritical and condescending. Other even went farther than me and questioned your credibility. Come to thing of it, may be you are right: you are neither hypocritical nor condescending but...

HonestAbe, I can't speak for ZM, of course, but I think he has the same general view of this subject as your. His "scrupule" comment was a sacarstic comment which aimed at bringing GG down from his hypocritical and condescending "high moral" attitude. I suspect that you did not have the time to...

I second this. T-76, you have earned my sincere respect. GG, this sentence of yours fits you best: "You are an im****le":mad: (A lesson of posting etiquette to you: learn the basic rules of civility of this Board and make use of asterisks).

LMAO. See, I told you, you are way smarter than me. With all due respect, please tell me: On Aug 25 at 8:05 pm: did you or did you not recommend Samantha? On Aug 25 at 8:05 pm: did you or did you not know about her age (18)? So can I conclude that On Aug 25 at 8:05 pm, you did recommend an...

This is so funny. LMAO! The irony is that GG, like in the case of Samantha, would gladly recommend "your 18-year old" daugther to other hobbyists. Yeah! that is exactly how he shows respect to the SP. Recommending a "kid" (he knew she was 18 when he highly recommended her) to the Merb hobbyists...

I was not implying anything. I just stated the fact as written by you. You raise the question about banning agencies that provide sp under 21 and yet you strongly recommend an sp who is barely 18. Bad example don`t you think. As you still have not make any changes to this Sexy Samantha thread, I...

And yet, until now you still feel quite confortable recommending her to other hobbyists. Hmmm...Not even a hint of a moral dilemma? :confused:

Marc Your agency was on my to-see list until the following makes me remove it from my list: 1) Your unfair intimidation of TOFFT because of one not-so-bad negative review. 2) Lanarchy's posts which annoyed 9 out of 10 posters. 3) Your subsequent posts patronizing the 9 posters. You should...