Search results

May be the following option should be added to the poll: - Hal takes compensations from SPs/Agencies to write bias reviews Personally I will take all Hal reviews with a huge grain of salt.

Well said! I wonder what would the reaction of FKS be if somebodyelse felt an ethical obligation to post a similar vague STI notice somewhereelse about an alleged member of FKS?

Yeah I agree. FKS web site is a backchannel. :p It's time to move on.

Granted. But regarding spreading STD rumor, the responsibility should not be limited to SP and clients. All accusers, be they virgins, agency owners, police officers, priests, imam, rabbi, goddess, etc, must provide proof and be held accountable for their acts.

Well said! Agreed!

Then I agree with you wholeheartly.

At the expense of the wronged SP who had to clear her name?

FKS wibe site is ditected to a clientele who can afford their prices but it sure is a public domain to me.

FKS has its own targeted clientele. That clientele is their public.

I know I'm not too smart. Why did you not blaming FKS? Gisele started the rumor, did she not? So do you approve that such STD speculation be posted in an agency web site or a web site like FKS as a notice to their customers / members about one of their own associates?:confused: :confused...

Why did an SP (Gisele) post the STD rumor on FKS web site? Was it not because of Gisele's misinformation that LL had to prove that she is STD-free? Mod7 brought this subject here to provide LL a medium to clear her name. Without Mod7 action, Gisele would be able to do heavy damage to LL...

Mod 7, you misread my post. I did not say that you forced LL to do anything (on the contrary, you did helped her by acting as a trustee). My point was that she was the only one who (forced by Gisele misinformation) had to provide a negative result as proof to clear her name while Gisele just has...

I hear you... But how come Lilly was the only one who had to provide a written proof of her negative result... :confused: The other FKS girls, Gisele included, got tested..at face value? My last words in this subject.

M7, I must disagree with you here. The "recently departed independent" (the number of inquiring PM from customers to LL proved that she was the suspect from day 1) would not have a chance to clear her name if not for your action, your credibility and the ability to use merb as a medium...

Mod 7, Thanked to your action, LL has a medium to clear her name.

Such a "may be experiencing some sort of STD" notice from FKS would ruin careers. Was it done purpsosely out of malice or was it a genuine public health notice? "May be experiencing" means that the author of the notice had no proof what so ever, i.e this was simply a rumor...alledgely in the...

Thank you.

I agree again. Calling other people "shit disturber" because of their differed opinion is part of free speech.

Techman, I did not know who I was dealing with. Please accept my apologies. I do cherish the freedom of speech.

Techman, I agree with you! However, I would respecfully ask you to change the words "shit disturber", I find it uncalled for because I thought I have the right to post my opinion as much as the next guy. Again, I can not speak for BD.