Search results

That is the key... and it is one of the reasons I like dealing with you guys (both this sounds like shilling!...now I'll have to say something bad about you...). Nobody gives a damn if a booker remember stuff in his head....but agencies like Sexy Nadyas, Good Girls and Asservissante that keep...

It has everything to do with the loonie. Teams collect revenues in CDN and pay expenses (including the cost to acquire the team and players salaries) in USD. At parity the numbers look good. But with the loonie at $0.80US the economics don't work.

That's my experience too. As Sapman says, girls working on their periods hide it through the use of sponges, and a "no digits" and a "I don't like DATY" policy....and of course...many simply go to the bathroom first and take out their tampon before the meeting.... Yes. Some. But by far most...

.... and open-ended...

The adoption of Bill C-36 which criminalizes the purchase of sexual services will surely lead to police action at some point. This has got me wondering about agencies that keep clients' names and phone numbers in their records. Does this worry you? Off the top of my head, the following...

Vous n'etes pays "Charlie" .... A quick "hats off" to the journos at the satirical Charlie Magazine in France. That said, I am less impressed with those behind the "Je suis Charlie" campaign. No you are not. The folks at Charlie Magazine risked their lives to defend freedom of speech...

RIP Joe Cocker. BTW ... his passing, while tragic, was a great way to smoke out all of 60+ yr. old MERBites....!

Escort category leaders: Jessy (from Céline Bizous, now The Big Boss of MSC) Marie-Eve (formerly of Asservissante) Marylin (Private Lies) RIP Three new categories (and suggestions): Reviewer category: Manapart (retired, two time winner of the Annual Best Reviewer Competition, 2011, 2012 now...

Absolutely. Hair is very important. I study SPs' nose and anal hair closely and measure with a ruler. Anything longer than an inch or two, and she is a definite no-repeat.

Not sure how I forgot to type that in. Will update. (He now has 5 BTW). So far the Best Reviewer competition looks like Delta123 and the seven dwarfs.... Delta 123, 10 votes Hungry 101, 5 votes UncleBob, 5 votes BookerL, 5 votes Reverdy, 4 votes Panthere, 4...

Results so far: Delta 123, 10 votes Hungry 101, 5 votes UncleBob, 5 votes BookerL, 5 votes Panthere, 4 votes SpecialAgent Moody, 3 votes Sharkman, 2 votes Special K, 2 votes Doc Holiday, 2 votes TheDon...

Your reminder about Delta 123 having been banned at one time is noted. You are also correct that Delta (like most reviewers) refrains for publishing overtly negative reviews. As you noted, many agencies will ban reviewers who write negative stuff. That said, Delta does generally manage to let...

There was a guy standing on a street corner asking everyone questions.... I started listening and then I just followed you here.

Results so far. Guys lets keep it down to three nominations per poster. Delta 123, 3 votes SpecialAgent Moody, 3 votes Special K, 2 votes Doc Holiday, 2 votes CloudSurf Igna, 1 vote BookerL, 2 votes Pat 98

I agree. I suppose that is why this thread is dead. It looks like Delta 123 is going to be the unanimous winner once again this year. I can't find a single other poster who has started more than four review threads in calendar 2014.

I guess it is that time of the year again. The time to honor the Best Reviewer of 2014. We are not looking for talkers. We are looking for doers. Those guys who go out in the trenches to do the research and reviewing work that make this board useful. Previous winners: 2013 Delta 123 2012...

This subject comes up quite a bit on this board and reaction is mixed. For example, Asservissante, one of the most popular agencies on this board, apparantly allows girls to work during their periods, or looks the other way when they do, and few of their clients appear to mind. On the...

Actually no....that was a real mistake...good catch...maybe we need a new thread: "Bad English in review boards: sloppiness or stupidity?"

Well, that was the (joking) point of the post...which I guess didn't work well. Another, second, joke in my post, was that I too mis-spelled the movie title...(I used the work "too," instead of "to." But I guess if you have to explain a joke....

I know. The bad English is driving me crazy. Like those idiots who marketed that movie Dumb and Dumber part too, even made spelling mistake in the title: http://www.cityoffilms.com/reel-news/the-shaggin-wagon-returns-in-this-dumb-and-dumber-to-poster/