they mentioned merb in passing by referring to <sites de reviews> or something like that
Euphoria agency in the news
- Thread starter ktm
- Start date
Those aren’t required, BBBJ seems to be. It’s also easier to avoid DFK than BBBJ. Not only is it easier, it’s also less awkward and by experience, men will want BBBJ but many aren’t into DFK and digits all that much
Not by name, still requires a little bit of research for the average viewer
Not saying agencies are perfect but if shit hits the fan im pretty sure they have some panic button where someone will come and help. I could be wrong but im not sure if Indies have the same safety measure. Maybe they do?
I can’t reveal my sources but indies and agencies will often just go with it even if the client isn’t hygienic. It’s not uncommon, sometimes they just do it because they want to avoid confrontation, drama or bad reviews on merb
Security is done differently. Indies do "screening" to prevent risk before they happen. Thats why some are very intrusive like asking for full name, sometimes even an identity card like driving liscence... Even a deposit let some kind of "trace" (unless its by gift cards, wich some accept but not all). Then they likely have cameras filming outside their places and so on.
Agencies surely have lobby cameras too but for the rest, all you need is a real phone number and thats it. So if a first time client book and things go sour, they need to be ready to intervene.
I doubt you’d bother the booker because a client’s penis smells like cheese. You might report after he leaves
However, if the client insists on getting a bj and becomes violent, yeah you’ll most likely contact the booker for help
Well those screening methods you mention only make it so if the client does something bad, he can easily be found out after its done.
It doesn't help her physically deter a guy like a security guard would
Anyways, if you’ve never done anything wrong and you know it, just keep it this way. You’re not who the journalists and LE are after. Agencies need normal people like you so book and don’t be suspicious you’ll be alright. Bonne nuit
I agree but at the same time, why is it mandatory in the first place? If it wasn't mandatory at any agency, things would be very different. Only the girls who truly want to do it, would be offering it. Also I agree that it should be YMMV. I know this isn't something people here want to hear.. What LC says is true.
Not everyone does ''intrusive'' screening. Personally I have developed a good intuition and I often get a pretty clear picture of what the client is going to be like as I first talk to him, but you never know..
And we have other safety measures for if something goes wrong with a client. You can call a friend, there is security at many incall buildings, etc. Sometimes a colleague will be nearby waiting for her next booking.
Last edited:
It still make peoples think twice on doing something bad tough. As they know she has all the infos.
@Lunaseraphim of course not everyone, but some does. I mean there is never an "all around model" in this business lol.
I've literally asked someone what happens if a literal homeless man with urine soaked clothing shows up at the door. One provider said that they would throw them in the shower repeatedly even if all the showers took most of the hour until acceptable, but they would not reject.
From what I understand is that even if a provider has multiple sources of income e.g. indy and/or agency, the agency provides a consistent and dependable baseline level of income if you work say 2-3 days a week 4-5 hours a day. Indy work less hectic, but at least in MTL it is incredibly sporadic with some highs and some lows. But if you have fixed expenses like rent, classes, a vehicle, dependents, etc, the agency is a lifesaver in providing peace of mind financially.
Socia is being pre-cautious, and forever I think might lay low for a bit. They usually post on Merb by now.
Goodnight, my head hurts after reading all of this.
Goodnight, my head hurts after reading all of this.
That's true. I think it does make people think twice, and it can also be a red flag if somebody refuses minimal screening, in my opinion.. If you don't want to screen you have other options anyways.
Aouch, j’ai vu que le site euphoria n’existe plus, donc l’agence a disapru pour de bon comme XO ? Pourtant dans l’article de Radio-canada ça ne disait pas que l’agence euphoria avait été démantelé..Quelqu'un en sait plus ?
Last edited:
I've heard on multiple occasions that the security the agencies have is quite intimidating and quite fast in responding. The one example I've heard where it was needed was one provider who worked at XO said one time another 6'5 man showed up after the first 6'5 man walked through the door both expecting services. Their security was able to remove both.
I think Forever's Sat schedule is already on their site since 10.
ouch, just watched the episode in its entirety. I wouldnt want to be that doctor. I just recently had a surgery at LasikMD lol. Glad he was not my Dr. This ophtamoligist is/was certainly a merb member.
I did not like how the report casually went from Euphoria, to this sick doctor, to minors in other agencies, to drugs, to XO. The casual viewer will not be able to tell the difference and equate all with Euphoria, a place by most accounts was on the ethical side of the business.
This 'journalist' Romain Schué sucks, the 'investigation' was clearly one-sided and biased. Not one mention of women who choose and are content with their participation in this industry, even agencies, as @Ariel18 's testimony confirms.
But ultimitately, I think this wont go anywhere long term. Poor Euphoria will probabaly have to lay low for a while, but hopefully they will recover.
And oh yeah, Richard Martineau of the Morality squad of the SPVM. He knows EVERTHING, and surely he knows that Euphoria is not the biggest problem in the city. He said "we go by priority and emergencies". They are surely not staffed sufficiently to investigate and take down all illegal sex work in the city, but more to monitor for the bad apples. But he was put on the spot by this journalist, did not look favourable. They had him in a shot with two female co-workers...what was that? strange.
I did not like how the report casually went from Euphoria, to this sick doctor, to minors in other agencies, to drugs, to XO. The casual viewer will not be able to tell the difference and equate all with Euphoria, a place by most accounts was on the ethical side of the business.
This 'journalist' Romain Schué sucks, the 'investigation' was clearly one-sided and biased. Not one mention of women who choose and are content with their participation in this industry, even agencies, as @Ariel18 's testimony confirms.
But ultimitately, I think this wont go anywhere long term. Poor Euphoria will probabaly have to lay low for a while, but hopefully they will recover.
And oh yeah, Richard Martineau of the Morality squad of the SPVM. He knows EVERTHING, and surely he knows that Euphoria is not the biggest problem in the city. He said "we go by priority and emergencies". They are surely not staffed sufficiently to investigate and take down all illegal sex work in the city, but more to monitor for the bad apples. But he was put on the spot by this journalist, did not look favourable. They had him in a shot with two female co-workers...what was that? strange.
Its likely James reacting before the storm. The article was likely the trigger for him wanting to stay low but the episode, likely seen by tens of thousands of peoples, is the confirmation. He knew lots of peoples would look for the Euphoria website so he was just pro active.
Its unknown if Euphoria will come back after a few days/weeks under the same name, a different one, or at all.
Time will tell
I would operate multiple small agencies as one instead of a big one. I just wonder how they launder the money. I actually know they had ties at some point with a software company that operated in the south shore. I think a software startup is the way to go.
Similar threads
