Recent content by davydream52

17 is crazy. I was learning how not to cut myself while shaving at that age. JFC.

Politicians and top cops anywhere in the world know who runs what and where and when

> Also remember that the limitation status in Canada is 12 months for this specific kind of crime This is true but in case if they want to persecute they can file it as an indictable offense which has no statute of limitation. Obviously they do it only when evidence is full proof.

Many are repeats or "loyal" buyers. In massachusetts brothel bust they went after the most repeating ones out of more than 2800 numbers they found. Out of these almost 3000 ones they identified 34 individuals. These 34 individuals had interaction in 100s of messages. Now I don't know if that...

What do you think the timeline in these cases are? Usually prosecuters have to follow the Jordan rule of 18 months provincially to present the case so at this point I know prosecuters are hurrying up. Then as for Johns, assuming they started investigation Spring 2024 and now it is Spring 2026...

I am not saying you would be proven guilty. But if they want to give clients a hard time then a traceable text with clear intention is enough. And this can easily destroy people's careers, personal relationships and also financial ordeal. In Massachusetts brothel trials, the clients or "sex...

The communication says that you asked for sex services even if you didn't get the appointment, they yeah you are cooked

For some reason I have a feeling more agencies are about to get raided

It's about to get even lower. The case is getting attention. The interview on youtube and LaPresse article is gettimg insane attention.

The IMEI associated with your device is registered with the cell towers along with the phone number you used. So basically no, you weren't fully anonymous. If you are using a device in this day and age, you are always trackable if authorities needed it to be. Having said that, they are not...

Agencies don't delete texts and your number if you contacted them in the past. There is no way to convince but there are enough clues that they infact do not delete.

> How would they accurately secure their contact information? If they have the court order that is good enough for the cellular companies give up all information they have available on listed numbers. The case hasn't been completed yet, I don't think it has even gone to trial yet so who's to say...

Yep I'm done with them too.

I swear they aren't deleting the texts. I don't do this activity often but agencies' responses tell me they have my old texts from months prior. I can bet this can be easily tested.

They are in a position to pick and choose a subset they believe is easier to criminate which may or may not include the most frequent "loyal" visitors. As for phone number owners, while cellular companies may not keep the old text and call logs, they do keep the owner information as far as back...