If anyone is blaming either Lincoln or FDR for those wars they've been gorging on BS for a long time.
So the works of Spooner are BS? Maybe you should pay a visit to Forest Hills and show some respect for this heroic Bay Stater.
Is it his Unconstitutionality of Slavery that is BS?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unconstitutionality_of_Slavery
While he was a tireless abolitionist in the 1840's & 1850's, pseudo hero Lincoln was sucking big fat railroad cock making it bigger and fatter at the expense of the rest of the country
and Lincoln sure sounded like a white supremacist as well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln%E2%80%93Douglas_debates
I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My understanding is that I can just let her alone
and here's what real-life hero Spooner had to say in his tour de force about cock-sucker-white-supremacist-Lincoln and his war;
Still another of the frauds of these men is, that they are now establishing, and that the war was designed to establish, "a government of consent." The only idea they have ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this -- that it is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot. This idea was the dominant one on which the war was carried on; and it is the dominant one, now that we have got what is called "peace."
Their pretenses that they have "Saved the Country," and "Preserved our Glorious Union," are frauds like all the rest of their pretenses. By them they mean simply that they have subjugated, and maintained their power over, an unwilling people. This they call "Saving the Country"; as if an enslaved and subjugated people -- or as if any people kept in subjection by the sword (as it is intended that all of us shall be hereafter) -- could be said to have any country. This, too, they call "Preserving our Glorious Union"; as if there could be said to be any Union, glorious or inglorious, that was not voluntary. Or as if there could be said to be any union between masters and slaves; between those who conquer, and those who are subjugated.
All these cries of having "abolished slavery," of having "saved the country," of having "preserved the union," of establishing "a government of consent," and of "maintaining the national honor," are all gross, shameless, transparent cheats -- so transparent that they ought to deceive no one -- when uttered as justifications for the war, or for the government that has suceeded the war, or for now compelling the people to pay the cost of the war, or for compelling anybody to support a government that he does not want.
https://books.google.com/books?id=m958CgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PT59#v=onepage&q&f=false





